Literature DB >> 708672

The perimeter as a monitor of glaucomatous changes.

H C Donovan, R A Weale, C Wheeler.   

Abstract

A small group of glaucoma patients with scotomata were compared with normal coevals. Plots were obtained of the error of each measurement as a function of retinal illumination. A statistical analysis shows the limitations of perimetry as a monitor of the progress of glaucoma. The significance of the data is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1978        PMID： 708672      PMCID： PMC1043330          DOI： 10.1136/bjo.62.10.705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN： 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  4 in total

1.  [Comparative studies on the value of quantitative perimetry, skiaskotometry and fusion frequency for the recognition of beginning visual field disorders in glaucoma].

Authors:  H HARMS; E AULHORN
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1959       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  The visual field defect and ocular pressure level in open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  M F Armaly
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-02

3.  [Application of Goldmann's static perimeter to the topographical relief of different luminance thresholds for small colored objects projected on a white background. I. Principles, calibration of the apparatus and comparative study of groups of normal subjects of different ages].

Authors:  G Verriest; A Israel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1965-04       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  The use of static perimetry in the early detection of glaucoma.

Authors:  S M Drance; C Wheeler; M Pattullo
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  1967-10       Impact factor: 1.882
  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Variability of glaucomatous visual field defects in computerized perimetry.

Authors:  C Holmin; C E Krakau
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-06-15

2.  Programmed visual field testing.

Authors:  D R Anderson
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1982

3.  Visual field test simulation and error in threshold estimation.

Authors:  S E Spenceley; D B Henson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The optic disc in glaucoma. IV: Optic disc evaluation in the ocular hypertensive patient.

Authors:  R A Hitchings; C A Wheeler
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 4.638
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.