Literature DB >> 7086316

Collective responsibility and the practice of medicine.

P A French.   

Abstract

In the following essay, the theoretical apparatus for distinguishing various types of collectivities (aggregates and conglomerates) is described. This is followed by a consideration of how responsibility ascriptions to different types of collectivities are to be understood vis à vis those to individual group members. It is suggested that the "medical profession" (distinctly different from the "medical team" and the "hospital corporation") is an aggregate collectivity. That is, the "medical profession" consists of the "sum" of the identities of its membership, which can be shown to entail that if the "profession" is held responsible for something, each of its members is responsible, in some way, for it. This is to suggest that the "medical profession" is not a shield that hides individual medical practitioners from responsibility for the general state of health care. Quite the contrary. The use of the name of the aggregate in such a responsibility ascription puts each and every one of them "on call."

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7086316     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/7.1.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  3 in total

Review 1.  The ethics of policy writing: how should hospitals deal with moral disagreement about controversial medical practices?

Authors:  E C Winkler
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  What is conscience and why is respect for it so important?

Authors:  Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2008

3.  Toward phase 4 trials in heart failure: A social and corporate responsibility of the medical profession.

Authors:  Pupalan Iyngkaran; Glen S Beneby
Journal:  World J Methodol       Date:  2015-12-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.