Literature DB >> 7085073

Chemotaxis of purified human monocytes in vitro: lack of accessory cell requirement.

W Falk, E J Leonard.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine whether cell cooperation, either among monocytes or between monocytes and lymphocytes, is a prerequisite for monocyte chemotactic responsiveness. We compared Ficoll-Hypaque-separated mononuclear cells and a preparation of 99% pure monocytes obtained by chemotaxis in a newly designed separation chamber. Monocytes of both preparations migrated to chemoattractants without a lag phase, and no further increase in migrated cells was observed after 70 min. The cell dose-response was linear for both preparations over a wide range of cell concentrations in the cell input well of the chemotaxis chamber, suggesting that no monocyte-monocyte interaction was required. Since only 20 to 60% of the monocytes purified by chemotaxis migrated a second time, the possibility of a requirement for an accessory cell was tested. The addition to purified monocytes of several different mononuclear cell preparations comprising lymphocytes or nonmigrating monocytes had no effect on monocyte migration. These experiments show that normal human blood monocytes in vitro do not require stimuli from other cells to respond to chemoattractants. Their behavior is profoundly different from that of mouse peritoneal macrophages, which exhibit a time lag in vitro before migration toward an attractant and become more responsive with either increasing cell concentration or addition of purified lymphocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7085073      PMCID: PMC351269          DOI: 10.1128/iai.36.2.591-597.1982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  17 in total

1.  Mouse mononuclear cell chemotaxis. I. Differential response of monocytes and macrophages.

Authors:  L Boumsell; M S Meltzer
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  An inhibitor of macrophage chemotaxis produced by neoplasms.

Authors:  R Snyderman; M C Pike
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Abnormal monocyte chemotactic response in cancer patients.

Authors:  D A Boetcher; E J Leonard
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Mouse mononuclear cell chemotaxis: description of system.

Authors:  D A Boetcher; M S Meltzer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Depressed mononuclear leukocyte chemotaxis in thermally injured patients.

Authors:  L C Altman; C T Furukawa; S J Klebanoff
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Suppression of in vitro antigen-induced lymphocyte transformation by carrageenan, a macrophage-toxic agent.

Authors:  W W Lake; D Bice; H J Schwartz; J Salvaggio
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Partial characterization of human C5a anaphylatoxin. I. Chemical description of the carbohydrate and polypeptide prtions of human C5a.

Authors:  H N Fernandez; T E Hugli
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Monocyte function in man.

Authors:  M C Territo; M J Cline
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Depression of macrophage function by a factor produced by neoplasms: a merchanism for abrogation of immune surveillance.

Authors:  M C Pike; R Snyderman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Resistance of neoplasms to immunological destruction: role of a macrophage chemotaxis inhibitor.

Authors:  G R Pasternack; R Snyderman; M C Pike; R J Johnson; H S Shin
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1978-07-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dynamics of chemotactic peptide-induced superoxide generation by human monocytes.

Authors:  E J Leonard; A Shenai; A Skeel
Journal:  Inflammation       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.092

2.  In vitro inhibition of murine macrophage migration by Bordetella pertussis lymphocytosis-promoting factor.

Authors:  B D Meade; P D Kind; J B Ewell; P P McGrath; C R Manclark
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Alveolar macrophage subpopulations' responsiveness to chemotactic stimuli.

Authors:  A L Brannen; D B Chandler
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.307

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.