Literature DB >> 7083537

Systemic thromboembolism in mitral and aortic Starr-Edwards prostheses: a 10-19 year follow-up.

V Fuster, C W Pumphrey, M D McGoon, J H Chesebro, J R Pluth, D C McGoon.   

Abstract

Our study comprised 302 consecutive patients seen between 1962 and 1971 who underwent mitral (MVR) (132 patients) or aortic valve replacement (AVR) (170 patients) with a Starr-Edwards prosthesis because of advanced mitral or aortic incompetence. The follow-up interval was 10-19 years. For more recent valve models (1200/1260 aortic or 6120/6310 mitral), the probability of a surviving patient remaining free of systemic thromboembolism after 10 years was 70% for MVR and 74% for AVR. The probability of freedom from thromboembolism was less than this for the earlier valve models; the probability for the entire group at 10 years was 66% and at 15 years was 58%, with no significant difference between AVR and MVR. About one-fourth of the patients with an embolism (20% MVR, 27% AVR) had more than one embolic event. Of all emboli, most (86% MVR, 84% AVR) were cerebral, about half (48% MVR, 57% AVR) left a neurologic deficit, and about one-tenth (11% MVR, 10% AVR) led to death. Of the predictive factors reviewed, the incidence of emboli was significantly higher only in patients with MVR considered to have inadequate anticoagulation (p less than 0.01) and in patients receiving model 6000 mitral prosthesis (p less than 0.02). This long-term follow-up study of patients with a Starr-Edwards prosthesis reveals that systemic embolism is a persistent and significant problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7083537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  5 in total

1.  Achieved anticoagulation vs prosthesis selection for mitral mechanical valve replacement: a population-based outcome study.

Authors:  Thierry Le Tourneau; Vanessa Lim; Jocelyn Inamo; Fletcher A Miller; Douglas W Mahoney; Hartzell V Schaff; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Antithrombotic therapy for prosthetic valves: routine treatment and special considerations.

Authors:  A M Al-Ahmad; D Hartnett-Daudelin; D N Salem
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Drug treatment associated with heart valve replacement.

Authors:  D S Coulshed; M A Fitzpatrick; C H Lee
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Optimal INR level for warfarin therapy after mechanical mitral valve replacement.

Authors:  Itthidet Kamthornthanakarn; Rungroj Krittayaphong
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Antithrombotic strategy in the three first months following bioprosthetic heart valve implantation.

Authors:  André R Durães; Milena A O Durães; Luis C L Correia; Roque Aras
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.000

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.