Literature DB >> 7083133

Combined histologic grading of prostatic carcinoma.

A Böcking, J Kiehn, M Heinzel-Wach.   

Abstract

A new histologic grading system for prostatic adenocarcinomas is presented, and its clinical significance tested. Histologic growth patterns and nuclear anaplasia found therein are evaluated independently of each other. The diagnostic categories are in accordance with the histologic classification recently published by the WHO. The tumor is denominated according to the least differentiated fraction. Three grades of malignancy, which correspond to significantly different survival probabilities, are distinguished. The prognosis of grade I patients is not reduced in comparison to that of healthy males of the same age. Grade I patients did not reveal metastases. The rate of tumor-specific deaths increases with the malignancy grade of the tumor. Interobserver reproducibility of this grading is found to be 91%. With 5% undergradings, the representativity is found to be satisfactory. Prostatic carcinomas tend to change their malignancy grades in time. The question of whether grade I prostatic carcinoma patients with early clinical stages benefit from therapy is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7083133     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820715)50:2<288::aid-cncr2820500220>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  10 in total

1.  Interactive computerized morphometric analysis for the differential diagnosis between dysplasia and well differentiated adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  F Aragona; V Franco; V Rodolico; G Dardanoni; D Cabibi; D Melloni; C Pavone; G Campesi; M Pavone-Macaluso
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1989

2.  Nuclear grading versus Gleason grading in small samples containing prostate cancer: a tissue microarray study.

Authors:  Daniel Wittschieber; Jens Köllermann; Thorsten Schlomm; Guido Sauter; Andreas Erbersdobler
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Prognostic value of histological grading in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Klöppel vs TNM grading.

Authors:  P C Giulianotti; U Boggi; G Fornaciari; J Bruno; G Rossi; D Giardino; G Di Candio; F Mosca
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1995-06

Review 4.  Reproducibility and reliability of tumor grading in urological neoplasms.

Authors:  Rainer Engers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Histologic grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: intraobserver reproducibility of the Mostofi, Gleason and Böcking grading systems.

Authors:  M L Cintra; A Billis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Epidemiologic aspects of latent and clinically manifest carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  G Dhom
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  The value of prognostic factors in prostatic cancer.

Authors:  J Schubert; S Kowalik
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Stereologically estimated mean nuclear volume of prostatic cancer is a reliable prognostic parameter.

Authors:  K Arima; Y Sugimura; T Hioki; A Yamashita; J Kawamura
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Loss of heterozygosity (LOH), malignancy grade and clonality in microdissected prostate cancer.

Authors:  A Hügel; N Wernert
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Analysis of Prostate Adenocarcinoma Histopathological Types in Relation to Tumor Grade.

Authors:  Andrei PĂnuŞ; Cristiana Eugenia Simionescu; Petru Octavian DrĂgoescu; Paul Tomescu; Alex Emilian Stepan
Journal:  Curr Health Sci J       Date:  2020-12-31
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.