Literature DB >> 7081271

Nephrotoxicity from angiographic contrast material. A prospective study.

J A D'Elia, R E Gleason, M Alday, C Malarick, K Godley, J Warram, A Kaldany, L A Weinrauch.   

Abstract

Three hundred and seventy-eight hospitalized patients undergoing nonrenal angiography were evaluated for subsequent changes in renal function. Acute renal failure was defined as a rise in the serum creatinine level of 1.0 mg/dl or more. Several factors that appeared to play no significant role in causing acute renal failure included: the volume of contrast material injected, the anatomic site of injection and the presence of a prior history of cardiovascular disease or diabetes mellitus. The single risk factor identified was the presence of preexistent azotemia (blood urea nitrogen of 30 mg/dl and serum creatinine of 1.5 mg/dl). Whereas nonazotemic patients had a 2 percent incidence of definite acute renal failure, patients with chronic azotemia (mean blood urea nitrogen/creatinine = 47/2.3 mg/dl) had a 33 percent incidence. Three patients required short-term dialysis, and two required potassium-exchange resin therapy. No patient required permanent dialysis, and no patient died of acute renal failure. The persistence of a positive nephrogram 24 hours after angiography was a sensitive detector of a rise in the serum creatinine level although more expensive than the creatinine determination. While urine sediment analysis confirmed the diagnosis in many cases, it was relatively insensitive. Monitoring of urine volume proved to be of little value. We recommend a screening serum creatinine determination 24 to 48 hours after infusion of angiographic contrast material in azotemic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7081271     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90536-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  18 in total

1.  Urine protein as a rapid screen for renal function in the ED: can it replace serum creatinine in selected patients?

Authors:  Jonathan Glauser; Aaron Montgomery
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-05-05

Review 2.  The adverse effects of angiographic radiocontrast media.

Authors:  M Westhoff-Bleck; J S Bleck; S Jost
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Renal experience with Visipaque.

Authors:  J A Jakobsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Acute renal failure in diabetics.

Authors:  A Grenfell
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: from diagnosis to treatment.

Authors:  P Carmichael; A R Carmichael
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in a pediatric setting: a cohort study.

Authors:  Aymeric Cantais; Zeineb Hammouda; Olivier Mory; Hugues Patural; Jean-Louis Stephan; Lyudmyla Gulyaeva; Michael Darmon
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 7.  Should nonionic radiographic contrast media be given to all patients?

Authors:  P S Parfrey; B C Cramer; P J McManamon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Digital vascular imaging and selective renin sampling in evaluation of vascular anatomy in renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  G A Khoury; J D Irving; K Farrington; Z Varghese; J W Persaud; P Sweny; J F Moorhead; O N Fernando
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-03-26

9.  Contrast media injection in the rat after multiple renal insults. No evidence of additional nephrotoxicity.

Authors:  A Verbaeys; S Ringoir; M Praet; G Van Maele; N Lameire
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1995

10.  Radiocontrast-induced renal failure.

Authors:  R T Misson; R E Cutler
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.