Literature DB >> 7076221

Professional review of laboratory utilization.

T S McConnell, P R Berger, H H Dayton, B E Umland, B E Skipper.   

Abstract

Overutilization of laboratory procedures is a significant problem, particularly in teaching institutions. The purpose of this study was to assess laboratory utilization patterns on the medical service of a university hospital, comparing data from implicit peer review by a pathologist with those from a group of practicing primary care physicians. Also, utilization of the most frequently ordered laboratory tests was compared with that of less common procedures. For charts reviewed both by the pathologist and by a panel of primary physicians, the pathologist found 26.5 per cent of tests unnecessary, while the primary physicians found 42.8 per cent unnecessary. The ten most frequently ordered tests had a significantly higher rate of overutilization than all other tests. Attempts to modify physicians' laboratory utilization should include concomitant peer review of the most commonly ordered procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7076221     DOI: 10.1016/s0046-8177(82)80229-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Pathol        ISSN: 0046-8177            Impact factor:   3.466


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pathology tests: is the time for demand management ripe at last?

Authors:  G Gopal Rao; M Crook; M L Tillyer
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Referrals and investigation patterns in a family physician group: questions for teaching cost containment.

Authors:  E V Dunn; P G Norton; W Nelson; D Bestvater
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Laboratory tests, interpretation, and use of resources: a program to introduce the basics.

Authors:  Marcia Abbott; Heidi Paulin; Davinder Sidhu; Christopher Naugler
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Laboratory investigations in general practice.

Authors:  S Salloum; E Franssen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  What can we learn from studies on regional differences in the utilization of laboratory tests?

Authors:  Anders Larsson
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.384

Review 6.  Establishing benchmarks and metrics for disruptive technologies, inappropriate and obsolete tests in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Frederick L Kiechle; Rodney C Arcenas; Linda C Rogers
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.786

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.