Literature DB >> 7074572

Evaluation of criteria for distinguishing atypical endometrial hyperplasia from well-differentiated carcinoma.

R J Kurman, H J Norris.   

Abstract

Endometrial curettings from 204 patients containing severe forms of atypical hyperplasia, carcinoma in situ, and well-differentiated carcinoma were compared with subsequent hysterectomy specimens to evaluate and identify the most useful histologic criteria for predicting the presence of invasive carcinoma. Endometrial stromal invasion, increased degrees of nuclear atypism, mitotic activity, cellular stratification, and epithelial necrosis in curettings were associated with a greater likelihood of carcinoma in the uterus. Of these, stromal invasion was the most significant feature. When stromal invasion was absent, carcinoma was present in the uterus in only 17%, and the carcinomas were well differentiated and confined to the endometrium or only superficially invasive. When stromal invasion was present in curettings, residual carcinoma was present in the uterus in half, and of these, one third were moderately or poorly undifferentiated and a quarter invaded deeply into the myometrium. The criteria for invasion are 1) an irregular infiltration of glands associated with an altered fibroblastic stroma or desmoplastic response; 2) a confluent glandular pattern in which individual glands are uninterrupted by stroma and merge to form a cribriform pattern of stromal replacement; 3) an extensive papillary pattern; and 4) replacement of stroma by masses of squamous epithelium. To qualify as invasion, 2, 3, and 4 must occupy at least one half (2.1 mm) of low power field 4.2 mm in diameter. Because of the important role of stromal invasion in predicting prognosis, future classifications of endometrial neoplasia should utilize this feature in distinguishing atypical hyperplasia from well differentiated adenocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7074572     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820615)49:12<2547::aid-cncr2820491224>3.0.co;2-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  21 in total

Review 1.  EIN and WHO94.

Authors:  J P A Baak; G L Mutter
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Risk of complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia in relation to anthropometric measures and reproductive history.

Authors:  Meira Epplein; Susan D Reed; Lynda F Voigt; Katherine M Newton; Victoria L Holt; Noel S Weiss
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  My approach to the interpretation of endometrial biopsies and curettings.

Authors:  W G McCluggage
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  [Myometrium and endometrium. Histopathologic aspects of benign lesions].

Authors:  C Y Genton
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Preoperative predictors of endometrial cancer at time of hysterectomy for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia or complex atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Monica Hagan Vetter; Blair Smith; Jason Benedict; Erinn M Hade; Kristin Bixel; Larry J Copeland; David E Cohn; Jeffrey M Fowler; David O'Malley; Ritu Salani; Floor J Backes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 6.  [Precursor lesions of endometrial carcinoma].

Authors:  S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.011

7.  Successful pregnancy in a patient with endometrial carcinoma treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Authors:  K Niwa; Y Yokoyama; T Tanaka; T Murase; S Morishita; M Itoh; N Itoh; K Shimokawa; T Tamaya
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  Immunodetection of sialyl-Tn antigen in normal, hyperplastic and cancerous tissues of the uterine endometrium.

Authors:  M Inoue; H Ogawa; O Tanizawa; Y Kobayashi; M Tsujimoto; T Tsujimura
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1991

Review 9.  Malignant tumors of the uterine corpus: molecular background of their origin.

Authors:  D Brany; D Dvorska; M Nachajova; P Slavik; T Burjanivova
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-08-26

Review 10.  [Pitfalls in the histopathological diagnostics of endometrial carcinoma and its precursors : Clinically relevant differential diagnoses, avoidance of false positive diagnoses].

Authors:  F Kommoss; S F Lax
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.