Literature DB >> 7073046

Prophylactic oxacillin in dog bite wounds.

R M Elenbaas, W K McNabney, W A Robinson.   

Abstract

This prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to determine the value of prophylactic oxacillin in dog bites. Adult patients with uninfected full-thickness wounds presenting within 24 hours of injury were considered. Management consisted of cleansing, irrigation, debridement, and closure as indicated; no topical antibiotics were applied. Patients were randomly assigned to receive oxacillin 500 mg QID x 5 days or identically appearing placebo. Home wound care was standardized an patients were observed at least every 2 days. Clinical assessment of infection was confirmed microbiologically. Sixty-three patients were admitted and 46 completed the study. Oxacillin (22) and placebo (24) groups were identical in sex, age, number of wounds per patient, wound location and type, number of open and closed wounds, delay to presentation, length of follow-up observation, medication compliance, and adequacy of patient wound care. Two infections of the hand occurred in patients receiving oxacillin; no infections were seen among placebo-treated patients (P = NS). Prophylactic oxacillin was not associated with improved outcome. We do not advise the use of prophylactic antibiotics in dog bite injuries treated within 24 hours of accident.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7073046     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(82)80093-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  10 in total

1.  Barking up the wrong tree? A survey of dog bite wound management.

Authors:  M R Smith; A Walker; J Brenchley
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Lack of in vitro efficacy of oral forms of certain cephalosporins, erythromycin, and oxacillin against Pasteurella multocida.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron; G A Richwald
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  A comparative double blind study of amoxycillin/clavulanate vs placebo in the prevention of infection after animal bites.

Authors:  P H Brakenbury; C Muwanga
Journal:  Arch Emerg Med       Date:  1989-12

4.  Wound infection following dog bite despite prophylactic penicillin.

Authors:  J Skurka; C Willert; R Yogev
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  Susceptibility of bite wound bacteria to seven oral antimicrobial agents, including RU-985, a new erythromycin: considerations in choosing empiric therapy.

Authors:  E J Goldstein; D M Citron; A E Vagvolgyi; S M Finegold
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Cephradine in the prophylactic treatment of dog bites.

Authors:  G J Ordog
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Management of bite wounds in children and adults-an analysis of over 5000 cases at a level I trauma centre.

Authors:  Manuela Jaindl; Gerhard Oberleitner; Georg Endler; Christiane Thallinger; Florian M Kovar
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  The management of animal bites in the United kingdom.

Authors:  E Evgeniou; D Markeson; S Iyer; A Armstrong
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2013-06-10

9.  Clinical Guidelines for the Antibiotic Treatment for Community-Acquired Skin and Soft Tissue Infection.

Authors:  Yee Gyung Kwak; Seong Ho Choi; Tark Kim; Seong Yeon Park; Soo Hong Seo; Min Bom Kim; Sang Ho Choi
Journal:  Infect Chemother       Date:  2017-12

Review 10.  Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.

Authors:  Judith Tanner; Jo C Dumville; Gill Norman; Mathew Fortnam
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-22
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.