Literature DB >> 7070620

Sitting prone position for the posterior surgical approach to the spine and posterior fossa.

A W Cook, T S Siddiqi, F Nidzgorski, H A Clarke.   

Abstract

The sitting prone position is compared with the standard laminectomy prone position and the sitting up position for posterior fossa surgery. We measured central venous pressure and airway pressure with the patient in different positions to determine the comparative efficacy of the sitting prone position. On a linear average, the central venous pressure increased by 6.83 cm H2O and the airway pressure increased by 3.16 cm H2O when the patient was changed from the supine to the standard prone position under general anesthesia; with a change from the standard prone position to the sitting prone position, the central venous pressure decreased by 10.45 cm H2O and the airway pressure decreased by 3.66 cm H2O. However, comparing the sitting prone position for posterior fossa surgery with the sitting up position, there was no statistically significant difference in central venous or airway pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7070620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  2 in total

1.  The position of the patient during neurosurgical procedures on the posterior fossa.

Authors:  L Calliauw; J Van Aken; G Rolly; L Verbeke
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  Incidence of thromboembolic complications in lumbar spinal surgery in 1,111 patients.

Authors:  Malcolm Nicol; Yu Sun; Niall Craig; Douglas Wardlaw
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-05-30       Impact factor: 3.134

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.