Literature DB >> 7070252

Biological variability in maximum aerobic power.

V L Katch, S S Sady, P Freedson.   

Abstract

The biological variation in maximum aerobic power (V O2max) was examined in four trained females and one trained male. An average of 8-20 repeat VO2max treadmill tests over a 2-4 wk period were performed on each subject (80 total tests). Biological variation (Si) in VO2max was computed as the standard deviation for the VO2max values for each individual, after subtracting net technological error (Se). Technological error was computed for each piece of equipment as the standard deviation of multiple trials. Results revealed that Si + Se amounted to +/- 5.6%. Biological variability accounted for 90% or more of this variability, while technological error accounted for less than 10%. In light of the magnitude of biological variation for VO2max, the necessity for securing control data when attempting to study training effects is pointed out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7070252     DOI: 10.1249/00005768-198201000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  46 in total

1.  A new incremental test for VO₂max accurate measurement by increasing VO₂max plateau duration, allowing the investigation of its limiting factors.

Authors:  Hélène Petot; Renaud Meilland; Laurence Le Moyec; Laurence Mille-Hamard; Véronique L Billat
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The verification phase and reliability of physiological parameters in peak testing of elite wheelchair athletes.

Authors:  Christof A Leicht; Keith Tolfrey; John P Lenton; Nicolette C Bishop; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Peak oxygen uptake. Myth and truth about an internationally accepted reference value.

Authors:  T Meyer; J Scharhag; W Kindermann
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-04

Review 4.  Automated metabolic gas analysis systems: a review.

Authors:  D J Macfarlane
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Criteria for determination of maximal oxygen uptake: a brief critique and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Adrian W Midgley; Lars R McNaughton; Remco Polman; David Marchant
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Influence of exercise intensity on time spent at high percentage of maximal oxygen uptake during an intermittent session in young endurance-trained athletes.

Authors:  Delphine Thevenet; Magaly Tardieu; Hassane Zouhal; Christophe Jacob; Ben Abderraouf Abderrahman; Jacques Prioux
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Treadmill validation of an over-ground walking test to predict peak oxygen consumption.

Authors:  J Widrick; A Ward; C Ebbeling; E Clemente; J M Rippe
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

8.  Factors affecting the estimated maximal oxygen uptake: a follow-up study of participants in the total health promotion plan.

Authors:  Yoshie Tobita; Yukinori Kusaka; Hideho Ohtaki; Kazuo Hashizume
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 9.  Tests of maximum oxygen intake. A critical review.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  Measurement of anaerobic capacities in humans. Definitions, limitations and unsolved problems.

Authors:  S Green; B Dawson
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.