Literature DB >> 7068297

Effect of training specificity on maximal treadmill and bicycle ergometer exercise.

F T Verstappen, R M Huppertz, L H Snoeckx.   

Abstract

Sixteen competitive athletes in long-distance running (n = 8) and cycle racing (n = 8) performed three maximal exercise tests on the treadmill as well as on the bicycle ergometer. The test protocol for both ergometers was similar in work intensity and duration. The results obtained at the maximum work load were compared between and within the two groups of athletes. Comparing treadmill to bicycle exercise, the oxygen uptake was 14% higher on treadmill in the long-distance runners, but equal in the cycle racers. The work efficiency on both types of ergometers showed a clear relationship with the training activity: the cycle racers worked more efficiently on the bicycle ergometer while the results of the long-distance runners were better on the treadmill. Heart rate and minute ventilation reached similar values in the cycle racers on both ergometers, but treadmill exercise induced higher values in the long-distance runners as compared to cycling. Opposite results were found in the variables of the acid-base balance: lactate concentration and base excess reached similar values (13 and -14 mmol l-1, respectively) in the long-distance runners on both ergometers, but in the cycle racers bicycle exercise induced higher values than running. From these results it can be concluded that congruence between the mode of ergometer exercise and the sport activity improves the validity of the test result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7068297     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1026061

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  13 in total

1.  Perceptual and physiological responses to cycling and running in groups of trained and untrained subjects.

Authors:  P Hassmén
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

2.  Treadmill and Cycle Ergometer Tests are Interchangeable to Monitor Triathletes Annual Training.

Authors:  Fabien A Basset; Marcel R Boulay
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Physiological and biomechanical comparison of roller skating and speed skating on ice.

Authors:  R W de Boer; E Vos; W Hutter; G de Groot; G J van Ingen Schenau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1987

4.  Differences in aerobic capacity and spirometric parameters between athletes and nonathletes: PS099.

Authors:  V Kostić
Journal:  Porto Biomed J       Date:  2017-09-01

5.  Can We Draw General Conclusions from Interval Training Studies?

Authors:  Ricardo Borges Viana; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; João Pedro Araújo Naves; Victor Silveira Coswig; Fabrício Boscolo Del Vecchio; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Carlos Alexandre Vieira; Paulo Gentil
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Benefits and practical use of cross-training in sports.

Authors:  S F Loy; J J Hoffmann; G J Holland
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Tests of maximum oxygen intake. A critical review.

Authors:  R J Shephard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Cardiorespiratory response to bicycle and rowing ergometer exercise in oarsmen.

Authors:  J Bouckaert; J L Pannier; J Vrijens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1983

9.  Cardiorespiratory Fitness Decline in Aging Firefighters.

Authors:  Xiang Gao; Nathan J Deming; Kristen Moore; Tasnuva Alam
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Use of the HR index to predict maximal oxygen uptake during different exercise protocols.

Authors:  Jeannie M Haller; Patricia C Fehling; David A Barr; Thomas W Storer; Christopher B Cooper; Denise L Smith
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2013-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.