Literature DB >> 7068191

Comparison of two automatic blood pressure recorders and the mercury sphygomomanometer.

A W Voors, M C Sklov, H Halperin, L S Webber, G S Berenson.   

Abstract

The Physiometrics automatic blood pressure recorder was compared with the mercury sphygmomanometer in 2200 children aged 5-14 years, each reexamined after 3 and 5 years; the Physiometrics recorder produced higher intrachild correlations. In trials we could transfer what were essentially Physiometrics readings into levels similar to mercury sphygmomanometric readings by filtering out the infrasonic frequency band. The Physiometrics USM-105 was compared with its successor, the Physiometrics SR-2, on 378 children aged 10-17 years. The SR-2 measured lower than the USM-105: 4.1 mm Hg systolic and 8.5 mm Hg diastolic; differences were larger in the younger children. Both in mean levels and correlations, SR-2 readings were closer to the mercury sphygmomanometer's than were USM-105 readings, except or diastolic SR-2 readings, which were farther below the mercury sphygomomanometer 4th-phase readings than the USM-105. However, the SR-2 readings are likely closer to the true diastolic pressure in children 13 years and older, although we did not measure pressures intraarterially. Disc readings for systolic pressures showed coefficients of correlation averaging 0.96 among (n = 168) and 0.98 within (n = 40) readers for both models, but diastolic readings showed marked improvement form USM-105 (0.73, 0.81) to SR-2 (0.91, 0.97). In many of the parameters observed, SR-2 constitutes an improvement over USM-105. Automatic recorders offer certain advantages for measuring blood pressure in large-scale epidemiologic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7068191     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.4.2.329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  1 in total

1.  Use of oscillometric devices for the measurement of blood pressure-comparison with the gold standard.

Authors:  Nivedita Kamath; B Ramakrishna Goud; Kishore D Phadke; Arpana Iyengar
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 1.967

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.