Literature DB >> 7063714

A prospective evaluation of computed tomography and ultrasound of the pancreas.

S J Hessel, S S Siegelman, B J McNeil, R Sanders, D F Adams, P O Alderson, H J Finberg, H L Abrams.   

Abstract

A prospective cooperative study was performed to assess the relative efficacy of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound in detecting and identifying pancreatic lesions. Of the 279 patients in the study, 146 were found to have a normal pancreas, and 133 had an abnormal pancreas. All patients underwent both CT and ultrasound examinations. Forty-four ultrasound examinations were technically unsatisfactory. When these suboptimal examinations were excluded, CT had a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.90 in detecting an abnormal pancreas. Ultrasound had a sensitivity of 0.69 and a specificity of 0.82. In detecting a lesion and identifying it as malignant or inflammatory, CT had a sensitivity of 0.84 and ultrasound had a sensitivity of 0.56. It is concluded that CT is the method of choice for detecting a pancreatic lesion, assessing its extent, and defining its etiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7063714     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  The use of spiral computed tomography in the evaluation of vessel encasement for pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  J D Cunningham; N Glajchen; S T Brower
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1996-02

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differentiating between pancreatic adenocarcinoma and inflammatory masses: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Wei Xu; Jian Shi; Yong Lin; Xin Zeng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Correlation of abdominal CT imaging with autopsy findings in patients with malignant tumors.

Authors:  M Winkelmann; W D Schoppe; N Volk; K F Bürrig; R M Jungblut; W Schneider
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Contribution of computed tomography to patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  J Wittenberg; J T Ferrucci; A L Warshaw
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Interpretation of diagnostic data: 2. How to do it with a simple table (part A).

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Suspected pancreatic cancer presenting as pain or weight loss: analysis of diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  M D Silverstein; J M Richter; D K Podolsky; A L Warshaw
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Risk factors for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and prospects for screening.

Authors:  G Anton Decker; Mashal J Batheja; Joseph M Collins; Alvin C Silva; Kristin L Mekeel; Adyr A Moss; Cuong C Nguyen; Douglas F Lake; Laurence J Miller
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2010-04

8.  The value of angiography in the surgical management of pancreatic disease.

Authors:  G V Appleton; N C Bathurst; J Virjee; M J Cooper; R C Williamson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Prospective comparison of three non-invasive tests for pancreatic disease.

Authors:  P N Foster; C J Mitchell; D R Robertson; I Hamilton; H Irving; J Kelleher; D J Lintott; P J Robinson; A T Axon; M S Losowsky
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-07-07

10.  Interpretation of diagnostic data: 5. How to do it with simple maths.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.