Literature DB >> 7059920

Tissue diagnosis for carcinoma of the pancreas and periampullary structures.

Y T Lee.   

Abstract

In a county hospital, 217 patients were operated on for suspected cancer of the pancreas (186 patients) and periampullary structures (31 patients). The surgeons' philosophy was to avoid biopsy of the pancreas whenever possible, they often performed radical resection based on clinical judgment alone (8% of the resections were chronic pancreatitis). Follow-up of the 65 patients who were presumed to have carcinoma without histologic proof showed the surgeon's clinical diagnosis to be incorrect in over 7% of the cases (maximum error - 18%). Among patients with carcinoma of the pancreas, one third of the pancreatic biopsies missed the lesion (surgeon's sampling error). Frozen section examination of pancreatic biopsies in 63 patients showed false positive and negative rates of 3% and 4%, respectively (pathologist's sampling or interpretation errors). Two of 31 incisional biopsy of the pancreas resulted in pancreatic fistula; none of 24 needle biopsies did. Otherwise, biopsy of the pancreas did not influence mortality or morbidity after either resection or bypass procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7059920     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820301)49:5<1035::aid-cncr2820490530>3.0.co;2-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Shomei Ryozawa; Hideaki Kitoh; Toshikazu Gondo; Naoki Urayama; Hiroaki Yamashita; Hirokazu Ozawa; Hideo Yanai; Kiwamu Okita
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.

Authors:  M Voss; P Hammel; G Molas; L Palazzo; A Dancour; D O'Toole; B Terris; C Degott; P Bernades; P Ruszniewski
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Intraoperative ultrasonography in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  G Serio; C Fugazzola; C Iacono; I A Bergamo Andreis; A Portuese; M Zicari; S Dall'Oglio; M Trivisone; A Dagradi
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1992-02

4.  Is intraoperative confirmation of malignancy during pancreaticoduodenectomy mandatory?

Authors:  Giuseppe Garcea; Matthew S Metcalfe; David P Berry; Gavin S Robertson; David M Lloyd; Ashley R Dennison
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  [Intraoperative diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma].

Authors:  P Hermanek
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1983

6.  Fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas: results of 204 routinely performed biopsies in 190 patients.

Authors:  O Søreide; E Skaarland; O M Pedersen; T B Larssen; B Arnesjø
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  DNA aneuploidy is an independent factor of poor prognosis in pancreatic and peripancreatic cancer.

Authors:  S Sciallero; W Giaretti; E Geido; L Bonelli; L Zhankui; S Saccomanno; E Zeraschi; V Pugliese
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1993-08

8.  Improvement of intraoperative frozen section diagnosis in patients with biliary strictures by Levovist injection into the bile duct on color Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  Takayuki Aimoto; Eiji Uchida; Yutaka Kawahigashi; Yoshiharu Nakamura; Akira Matsushita; Akira Katsuno; Kazumitsu Chou; Masao Kawamoto; Yoichiro Yamanaka; Takashi Tajiri; Zenya Naito
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Diagnostic Challenge in Pancreatic Sarcoidosis Using Endoscopic Ultrasonography.

Authors:  Nobuaki Azemoto; Teru Kumagi; Mitsuhito Koizumi; Taira Kuroda; Hirofumi Yamanishi; Yoshinori Ohno; Yoshiki Imamura; Eiji Takeshita; Yoshiko Soga; Yoshiou Ikeda; Morikazu Onji; Yoichi Hiasa
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.271

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.