Literature DB >> 7055637

Bone marrow cell count per cubic millimeter bone marrow: a new parameter for quantitating therapy-induced cytoreduction in acute leukemia.

W Hiddemann, B D Clarkson, T Büchner, M R Melamed, M Andreeff.   

Abstract

A new technique is introduced for determining the number of bone marrow cells per cubic millimeter marrow, providing an accurate and objective means for quantitating therapy-induced cytoreduction. The method requires a correction for admixed peripheral blood in bone marrow aspirates to measure the fraction of remaining pure marrow. While cell kinetic differences between blood, aspirates, and biopsies identify the proportion of contaminating blood cells, the ratio of red cell hematocrits in blood and aspirate gives the volume of trapped blood. By combining both procedures, bone marrow cell counts per unit volume pure marrow result (BMC/cu mm BM), which were found highly reproducible. Blast cell counts (BMBC/cu mm BM) were obtained by additional morphological differentiation. BMC and BMBC/cu mm BM were monitored in 16 patients with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia treated with daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside, and 6-thioguanine in combination and in 4 patients with end-stage acute leukemias and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas during high-dose thymidine therapy. Total and daily therapy-induced cytoreduction rates were significantly greater (P less than 0.01) in responders than nonresponders to either regimen. Changes in BMC/cu mm BM were also found representative for changes in BMBC/cu mm BM, since the majority of bone marrow cells were blasts. In acute leukemia. BMC/cu mm BM thus provides accurate and objective measurements of treatment efficacy in vivo and after short periods of drug exposure. Differences in cytoreduction rates within the group of responders also suggest possible prognostic implications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7055637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  7 in total

Review 1.  Bone marrow evaluation for diagnosis and monitoring of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Mary-Elizabeth Percival; Catherine Lai; Elihu Estey; Christopher S Hourigan
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 8.250

2.  Changes in magnetic resonance bone marrow angiogenesis on day 7 after induction chemotherapy can predict outcome of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Hsin-An Hou; Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih; Chieh-Yu Liu; Bang-Bin Chen; Jih-Luh Tang; Ming Yao; Shang-Yi Huang; Wen-Chien Chou; Chao-Yu Hsu; Hwei-Fang Tien
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Recent advances in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults and future prospects.

Authors:  B Clarkson; J Gaynor; B R Franza; M Furth
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1985

4.  Early assessment of treatment response in patients with AML using [(18)F]FLT PET imaging.

Authors:  Matt Vanderhoek; Mark B Juckett; Scott B Perlman; Robert J Nickles; Robert Jeraj
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.156

5.  Targeted drug delivery by gemtuzumab ozogamicin: mechanism-based mathematical model for treatment strategy improvement and therapy individualization.

Authors:  Eva Jager; Vincent H J van der Velden; Jeroen G te Marvelde; Roland B Walter; Zvia Agur; Vladimir Vainstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Modeling bystander effects that cause growth delay of breast cancer xenografts in bone marrow of mice treated with radium-223.

Authors:  Didier A Rajon; Brian S Canter; Calvin N Leung; Tom A Bäck; J Christopher Fritton; Edouard I Azzam; Roger W Howell
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Immunophenotyping in myelodysplastic syndromes can add prognostic information to well-established and new clinical scores.

Authors:  Suiellen C Reis-Alves; Fabíola Traina; Guilherme Harada; Paula M Campos; Sara T O Saad; Konradin Metze; Irene Lorand-Metze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.