Literature DB >> 7055382

Prognostic factors for patients with clinical stage I melanoma of intermediate thickness (1.51 - 3.39 mm). A conceptual model for tumor growth and metastasis.

C L Day, M C Mihm, R A Lew, M N Harris, A W Kopf, T B Fitzpatrick, T J Harrist, F M Golomb, A Postel, P Hennessey, S L Gumport, J W Raker, R A Malt, A B Cosimi, W C Wood, D F Roses, F Gorstein, D Rigel, R J Friedman, M M Mintzis, A J Sober.   

Abstract

Fourteen variables were tested for their ability to predict visceral or bony metastases in 177 patients with clinical Stage I melanoma of intermediate thickness (1.51 - 3.39 mm). A Cox multivariate analysis yielded a combination of four variables that best predicted bony or visceral metastases for these patients: 1) mitoses greater than 6/min 2 (p = 0.0007), 2) location other than the forearm of leg) p = 0.009, 3) ulceration width greater than 3 mm (p = 0.04), 4) microscopic satellites (p = 0.05). The overall prognostic model chi square was 32.40 with 4 degrees of freedom (p less than 10 (-5). Combinations of the above variables were used to separate these patients into at least two risk groups. The high risk patients had at least a 35% or greater chance of developing visceral metastases within five years, while the low risk group had greater than an 85% chance of being disease free at five years. Criteria for the high risk group were as follows: 1) mitoses greater than 6/mm 2 in at least one area of the tumor, irrespective of primary tumor location, or 2) a melanoma located at some site other than the forearm or leg and histologic evidence in the primary tumor of either ulceration greater than 3 mm wide or microscopic satellites. The low risk group was defined as follows: 1) mitoses less than or equal to 6/mm 2 and a location on the leg or forearm, or 2) mitoses less than or equal to 6/mm 2 and the absence in histologic sections of the primary tumor of both microscopic satellites and ulceration greater then 3 mm wide. The number of patients in this series who did not undergo elective regional node dissection (N = 47) was probably too small to detect any benefit from this procedure. Based on survival rates from this and other studies, it is estimated that approximately 1500 patients with clinical Stage I melanoma of intermediate thickness in each arm of a randomized clinical trial would be needed to detect an increase in survival rates from elective regional node dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7055382      PMCID: PMC1352401          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198201001-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  27 in total

1.  Inefficacy of immediate node dissection in stage 1 melanoma of the limbs.

Authors:  U Veronesi; J Adamus; D C Bandiera; I O Brennhovd; E Caceres; N Cascinelli; F Claudio; R L Ikonopisov; V V Javorskj; S Kirov; A Kulakowski; J Lacoub; F Lejeune; Z Mechl; A Morabito; I Rodé; S Sergeev; E van Slooten; K Szcygiel; N N Trapeznikov
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  A Breslow
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The histogenesis and biologic behavior of primary human malignant melanomas of the skin.

Authors:  W H Clark; L From; E A Bernardino; M C Mihm
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Malignant melanoma of the extremities: a clinicopathologic study using levels of invasion (microstage).

Authors:  H J Wanebo; J Woodruff; J G Fortner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Prognostic factors in cutaneous malignant melanoma in stage I. A clinical, morphological and multivariate analysis.

Authors:  J Eldh; B Boeryd; L E Peterson
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1978

6.  A multifactorial analysis of melanoma: prognostic histopathological features comparing Clark's and Breslow's staging methods.

Authors:  C M Balch; T M Murad; S J Soong; A L Ingalls; N B Halpern; W A Maddox
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Melanoma of the trunk: the results of surgical excision and anatomic guidelines for predicting nodal metastasis.

Authors:  E V Sugarbaker; C M McBride
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Prognostic index in malignant melanoma.

Authors:  C Schmoeckel; O Braun-Falco
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1978-06

9.  The regressing thin malignant melanoma: a distinctive lesion with metastatic potential.

Authors:  M A Gromet; W L Epstein; M S Blois
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Stage I melanoma of the limbs: assessment of prognosis by levels of invasion and maximum thickness.

Authors:  A Breslow; N Cascinelli; E P van der Esch; A Morabito
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1978-06-30
View more
  18 in total

1.  The significance of inflammation and regression in melanoma.

Authors:  M G Cook
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Review of general surgery 1982.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Prognostic significance of DNA aneuploidy in stage I cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  S M Kheir; S D Bines; J H Vonroenn; S J Soong; M M Urist; J S Coon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Management of the regional lymph nodes in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  A J Cochran; D R Wen; D L Morton
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The extent of primary melanoma excision. A re-evaluation--how wide is wide?

Authors:  D R Aitken; K Clausen; J P Klein; A G James
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The prognostic significance of tumor vascularity in intermediate-thickness (0.76-4.0 mm thick) skin melanoma. A quantitative histologic study.

Authors:  A Srivastava; P Laidler; R P Davies; K Horgan; L E Hughes
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.307

7.  Prognostic factors for melanoma patients with lesions 0.76 - 1.69 mm in thickness. An appraisal of "thin" level IV lesions.

Authors:  C L Day; M C Mihm; A J Sober; M N Harris; A W Kopf; T B Fitzpatrick; R A Lew; T J Harrist; F M Golomb; A Postel; P Hennessey; S L Gumport; J W Raker; R A Malt; A B Cosimi; W C Wood; D F Roses; F Gorstein; D Rigel; R J Friedman; M M Mintzis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  A comparison of prognostic factors and surgical results in 1,786 patients with localized (stage I) melanoma treated in Alabama, USA, and New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  C M Balch; S J Soong; G W Milton; H M Shaw; V J McGovern; T M Murad; W H McCarthy; W A Maddox
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Expression of the p53 protein in malignant melanomas as a prognostic indicator.

Authors:  M Yamamoto; H Takahashi; K Saitoh; T Horikoshi; M Takahashi
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.017

10.  The Ki-67 antigen in primary human melanomas--its relationship to mitotic rate and tumor thickness and its stability.

Authors:  H Ostmeier; L Suter
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.017

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.