Literature DB >> 7055377

The role of electron microscopy in the management of surgical patients.

D C Kuzela, L D True, B Eiseman.   

Abstract

This report records a 12-month experience with 49 neoplasms submitted to the hospital pathologists for electron microscopic (EM) diagnosis as a part of routine clinical surgical practice. Twenty-five specimens were from a private community hospital and 24 from a university hospital. In 40 of 49 cases (82%), EM confirmed a tentative light microscopic (LM) diagnosis. In 11 of these 40 cases, EM provided a more specific histogenetic diagnosis than was possible by LM. In three cases (6%), EM corrected the original LM diagnosis. In two cases EM did resolve a diagnostic dilemma. EM is a beneficial adjunct to the correct diagnosis of selected tumors. Although in general EM does not help differentiate benign from malignant tumors, it is helpful in identifying the cell of origin of poorly differentiated neoplasma. A more precise histogenetic diagnosis was judged to be clinically helpful in 56% of th cases studied in this experience. EM is a relatively inexpensive ($115-250) and prompt (three to five days) adjunct to surgical care. It should be routinely available to the practicing surgeon for help in determining the cell type of confusing tumors. EM is no longer simply a research tool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7055377      PMCID: PMC1352396          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198201001-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  8 in total

1.  Electron microscopy in the Veterans Administration for service pathology: some administrative aspects of the program.

Authors:  M J Williams
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Experience with a three-hour electron microscopy biopsy service.

Authors:  G Rowden; M G Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Application of electron microscopy to the differential diagnosis of tumors.

Authors:  J Rosai; H A Rodriguez
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Electron microscopy for the diagnosis of tumours.

Authors:  I Carr; P G Toner
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-02-19       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Rapid electron microscopy in oncology.

Authors:  I Carr; P G Toner
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The contribution of electron microscopy to the differential diagnosis of tumors.

Authors:  D S Bonikos; K G Bensch; R L Kempson
Journal:  Beitr Pathol       Date:  1976-09

7.  The clinician's view of diagnostic electron microscopy.

Authors:  W A Burns; H J Zimmerman; J Hammond; A Howatson; A Katz; J White
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  The usefulness of electron microscopy in the diagnosis of human tumors.

Authors:  F Gyorkey; K W Min; I Krisko; P Gyorkey
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.466

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Electron microscopy: an essential tool for morphological diagnosis?

Authors:  E G Olsen
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-06-26

2.  An assessment of the value of electron microscopy in tumour diagnosis.

Authors:  C Fisher; A D Ramsay; M Griffiths; J McDougall
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.