Literature DB >> 7053953

A comparison of various types of patient instruction in the proper administration of metered inhalers.

R J Roberts, J D Robinson, P L Doering, J J Dallman, R A Steeves.   

Abstract

The administration technique employed by 42 inpatients using metered inhalers were observed. Proper performance of the six steps recommended by the manufacturer provided the guidelines for correct administration. The degree of compliance with proper technique was defined as the number of steps correctly executed by the patient. The mean number of steps correctly performed was 2.9 out of the possible six (48.3 percent). Twenty-four patients were then randomized into one of three groups. Group I received the manufacturer's instruction sheet, Group 2 received counseling from a pharmacist, and Group 3 received both the manufacturer's instruction sheet and counseling from a pharmacist. There was a significant improvement in the postinstruction technique in Groups 2 and 3, while Groups 1 failed to demonstrate any significant improvement. Comparisons were then made among the three groups. No significant difference was found between Group 2 and Group 3. However, both Groups 2 and 3 were found to be significantly different (p less than 0.05) from Group 1. This study shows that pharmacist counseling can significantly improve the degree of patient compliance in the administration of metered inhalers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7053953     DOI: 10.1177/106002808201600107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm        ISSN: 0012-6578


  2 in total

Review 1.  Objectives, methods and content of patient education programmes for adults with asthma: systematic review of studies published between 1979 and 1998.

Authors:  P Sudre; S Jacquemet; C Uldry; T V Perneger
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  The value of demonstration and role of the pharmacist in teaching the correct use of pressurized bronchodilators.

Authors:  T H Self; J B Brooks; P Lieberman; M R Ryan
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-01-15       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.