Literature DB >> 7052788

Difficulties in assessing the adverse effects of drugs.

M S Kramer.   

Abstract

1 In recent years the phenomenon of the adverse drug reaction (ADR) has become a focus of increased attention and research, and we have become aware of the clinical complexity of the phenomenon and some of the difficulties inherent in assessing adverse effects. Evidence for such difficulties includes the discrepancies in figures for ADR incidence in epidemiological studies, the non-specificity and suggestibility of ADR symptoms, and the substantial disagreements, even among experts, in the diagnosis of ADRs. 3 An observed clinical manifestation heavily depends on the clinical setting and on the intent of the clinician, and the large number of factors that many confound the link between a given manifestation and an administered drug. A diagnostic algorithm, or branched logic decision format, has recently been developed. It comprises six axes of decision strategy and provides standardized, operational rules for rating the probability of an ADR.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7052788      PMCID: PMC1401635          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1981.tb01845.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0306-5251            Impact factor:   4.335


  23 in total

1.  Drug-induced illness leading to hospitalization.

Authors:  G J Caranasos; R B Stewart; L E Cluff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-05-06       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Adverse reactions to drugs: a comprehensive hospital inpatient survey.

Authors:  N A Smidt; E G McQueen
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1972-12

3.  Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions. A report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program.

Authors:  R R Miller
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1974-08

4.  Adverse nondrug reactions.

Authors:  M M Reidenberg; D T Lowenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1968-09-26       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Systematic errors in the evaluation of side effects.

Authors:  C W Avery; B P Ibelle; B Allison; N Mandell
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Intensive hospital monitoring of adverse reactions to drugs.

Authors:  N Hurwitz; O L Wade
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-03-01

7.  Side reactions in neurotics. I. A comparison of two methods of assessment.

Authors:  R W Downing; K Rickels; F Meyers
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol J New Drugs       Date:  1970 Sep-Oct

8.  Adverse drug reactions in a veterans administration hospital.

Authors:  R I Wang; L C Terry
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs       Date:  1971 Jan-Feb

9.  Intensive monitoring for adverse drug effects in patients discharged from acute medical wards.

Authors:  G S Kellaway; E McCrae
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1973-12-26

10.  Adverse drug reactions during hospitalization.

Authors:  R I Ogilvie; J Ruedy
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1967-12-09       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of three methods (consensual expert judgement, algorithmic and probabilistic approaches) of causality assessment of adverse drug reactions: an assessment using reports made to a French pharmacovigilance centre.

Authors:  Hélène Théophile; Yannick Arimone; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Nicholas Moore; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Françoise Haramburu; Bernard Bégaud
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Agreement of expert judgment in causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Yannick Arimone; Bernard Bégaud; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Nicholas Moore; Mathieu Molimard; Françoise Haramburu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Inter-expert agreement of seven criteria in causality assessment of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  Yannick Arimone; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Françoise Haramburu; Mathieu Molimard; Nicholas Moore; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Bernard Bégaud
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Comparison of three methods (an updated logistic probabilistic method, the Naranjo and Liverpool algorithms) for the evaluation of routine pharmacovigilance case reports using consensual expert judgement as reference.

Authors:  Hélène Théophile; Manon André; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Yannick Arimone; Bernard Bégaud
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  A new approach to identify, classify and count drug-related events.

Authors:  Thomas Bürkle; Fabian Müller; Andrius Patapovas; Anja Sonst; Barbara Pfistermeister; Bettina Plank-Kiegele; Harald Dormann; Renke Maas
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Defining and measuring meditation-related adverse effects in mindfulness-based programs.

Authors:  Willoughby B Britton; Jared R Lindahl; David J Cooper; Nicholas K Canby; Roman Palitsky
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-11-01

7.  Development of an algorithm to identify serious opioid toxicity in children.

Authors:  Cecilia P Chung; S Todd Callahan; William O Cooper; Katherine T Murray; Kathi Hall; Judith A Dudley; C Michael Stein; Wayne A Ray
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2015-07-04

8.  Dramatyping: a generic algorithm for detecting reasonable temporal correlations between drug administration and lab value alterations.

Authors:  Axel Newe
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.