Literature DB >> 7050696

DNA repair assays as tests for environmental mutagens. A report of the U.S. EPA Gene-Tox Program.

K H Larsen, D Brash, J E Cleaver, R W Hart, V M Maher, R B Painter, G A Sega.   

Abstract

A literature review was undertaken to determine the usefulness of DNA repair assays, other than unscheduled DNA synthesis, as screening techniques for mutagenic carcinogens. 92 reports were found to contain useful data for 49 chemicals using 6 techniques, namely, (1) cesium chloride equilibrium density gradients to study repair replication, (2) benzoylated naphthoylated diethylaminoethyl cellulose columns to study repair replication, (3) 313-nm irradiation of DNA containing bromodeoxyuridine to study repair replication, (4) alkaline elution to study repair of single-strand breaks and crosslinks, (5) alkaline sucrose gradients to study repair of single-strand breaks, and (6) direct assays for removal of adducts from DNA. Almost all of the 49 chemicals studied were known mutagens or carcinogens and/or known inducers of DNA repair, 9 compounds failed to elicit DNA repair by at least 1 assay technique, and at least 3 of these were not tested by the most appropriate and sensitive method. Nevertheless, although valid for studying repair phenomena in eukaryotic cells, these assays are not considered useful for screening. They are time-consuming, expensive, and/or require highly specialized skills. Despite the high frequency of positive reports, it is obvious from the literature that repair assays will fail to detect, or will detect with low efficiency, those agents whose main action is either intercalation or induction of strand breaks. For these and other reasons, DNA repair as a basis for screening for mutagenic carcinogens is not considered to be a useful concept.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7050696     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(82)90037-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  4 in total

1.  Alkali-labile sites in daughter DNA of damaged Escherichia coli do not reflect apyrimidinic sites.

Authors:  V Slezáriková
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Biomonitoring of DNA damage by alkaline filter elution.

Authors:  G Doerjer; U Buchholz; K Kreuzer; F Oesch
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  In vitro induction of unscheduled DNA synthesis by genotoxic carcinogens in the hepatocytes of the oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau).

Authors:  J J Kelly; M B Maddock
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  Chemical carcinogens: a review of the science and its associated principles. U.S. Interagency Staff Group on Carcinogens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.