The mesothelium and its reactions: a review.

The origins, nature, and reactions of the mesothelium have intrigued investigators for over 100 years. Recently, the use of sophisticated techniques has clarified earlier impressions of its development, structure, and function. The structure of mesothelium reflects its functional properties, its long slender microvilli entrapping a layer of glycosoaminoglycans, providing a frictionless free surface between the parietal and visceral serosa. Transport requirements are met by various surface modifications and both inter- and intra-cellular mechanisms occur. The presence of stomatal openings in the mesothelial membrane has been established, and they may have a major role to play in the movement of cells to and from the serosal cavities. In addition, mesothelial cells can respond to situations of increased functional demand and during the course of inflammation, the mesothelium's fibrinolytic properties are of major importance in preventing the formation of adhesions and the enhancement of healing. Of all the unanswered questions the most significant is the nature, localization, and potentialities of mesothelial precursors. A mesodermal origin is readily acknowledged, but the healing process of damaged mesothelium is less clear. It seems probable that "mature" mesothelium is one source of cell renewal, but mesenchymal cells located in the submesothelial serosa are also strong contenders. Neoplastic mesothelium can adopt a spectrum of histological appearances, reflecting its mesodermal origins. In fact, overacceptance of this concept has erroneously led to the classification of other neoplasms arising in the serosal area as mesotheliomas. Although the ocogenic sequence is still obscure, asbestos is recognized as the major etiologic agent in malignant mesotheliomas. In 1955, Hartwell described differing impressions of the peritoneum as seen through the eyes of an anatomist, an histologist, and a surgeon. In this review on the mesothelium we have attempted to unravel some of its complexities as viewed by embryologists, electronmicroscopists, cell biologists, pathologists, and oncologists.