Literature DB >> 7044680

Hemodynamic response to changes in ventilatory patterns in patients with normal and poor left ventricular reserve.

M Mathru, T L Rao, A A El-Etr, R Pifarre.   

Abstract

Hemodynamic effects of controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV), intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV), and intermittent mandatory ventilation with 5 cm H20 PEEP (IMV 5 peep) were studied in 20 patients after aortocoronary bypass surgery. Significant increases in cardiac index (CI) and stroke volume index (SI) (p less than 0.01) resulted in patients with normal left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and ejection fraction (EF) changing from CMV to IMV. With a change from IMV to IMV 5 peep, the CI and SI returned to CMV values. However, in patients with increased LVEDP with an EF of less than 0.6, suggesting poor ventricular function and reserve, when the mode of ventilation was changed from CMV to IMV, right atrial pressure (RAP) and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) significantly increased (p less than 0.01) with an associated significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP), CI, SI (p less than 0.01). When these patients were placed on IMV 5 peep, the hemodynamic variables returned to the values obtained during CMV. We conclude that changing from CMV to IMV has salutory effects on the patient's hemodynamic values with normal left ventricular function. But in patients with failing left ventricle, volume overload of right ventricle which occurs with the institution of spontaneous respiration during IMV has deleterious effects on the hemodynamic variables. These deleterious effects can be effectively negated by the application of IMV 5 peep.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7044680     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198207000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  9 in total

1.  Influence of pleural pressure variations on cardiovascular system dynamics: a model study.

Authors:  Y Goldstein; R Beyar; S Sideman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  Consensus conference on mechanical ventilation--January 28-30, 1993 at Northbrook, Illinois, USA. Part I. European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, the ACCP and the SCCM.

Authors:  A S Slutsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The cardiovascular effects of weaning: stratifying patient populations.

Authors:  J L Robotham; L C Becker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Alternative modes of ventilation. Part I. Disadvantages of controlled mechanical ventilation: intermittent mandatory ventilation.

Authors:  S M Willatts
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Right ventricular function during weaning from mechanical ventilation after coronary artery bypass grafting: effect of volume loading.

Authors:  P Bizouarn; Y Blanloeil; C Billaud-Debarre
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Effects of continuous (CPAP) and bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) on extravascular lung water after extubation of the trachea in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  R Gust; A Gottschalk; H Schmidt; B W Böttiger; H Böhrer; E Martin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  State of the evidence: mechanical ventilation with PEEP in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Jonathan Wiesen; Moshe Ornstein; Adriano R Tonelli; Venu Menon; Rendell W Ashton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Anaesthesia for coronary artery surgery--a plea for a goal-directed approach.

Authors:  R I Hall
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 9.  Prevention and treatment of severe hemodynamic compromise in pediatric heart transplant patients.

Authors:  John M Costello; Elfriede Pahl
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.022

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.