Literature DB >> 7043116

The effect of concurrent feedback in reducing inappropriate hospital utilization.

J D Restuccia.   

Abstract

This study conducted in four general hospitals, evaluates the effectiveness of feedback from utilization review coordinators in reducing the number of inappropriate hospital days. Experimental control was exerted over the type of feedback provided in the utilization review process to produce four treatment groups (including a control group) that vary according to 1) the channel used to inform an attending physician of a probable inappropriately located patient and 2) the amount of discretion permitted the nurse coordinator in deciding whether, when and to whom this information is provided. The results of the study indicate that physician and hospital performance in utilization review, measured both by inappropriate patient days and length of stay, are affected by the feedback strategy employed. For patients inappropriately located for a portion of their hospital stay, provision of concurrent feedback resulted in reduction of approximately two thirds of an inappropriate day and two and one half total days, compared with patients for whom no feedback was provided or for whom physician advisor involvement was required. In addition, the effect of reasons causing patients to be inappropriately located (barriers) was assessed. Barriers outside the realm of influence of the hospital or the physician were found to impede the effectiveness of the utilization review systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7043116     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198201000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  12 in total

1.  Review of the utilisation of a university hospital in Barcelona (Spain): evolution 1992-1996.

Authors:  G Navarro; A Prat-Marin; M Asenjo; A Menacho; A Trilla; L Salleras
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 2.  Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Grimshaw; N Freemantle; S Wallace; I Russell; B Hurwitz; I Watt; A Long; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03

Review 3.  Variations in lengths of stay and rates of day case surgery: implications for the efficiency of surgical management.

Authors:  M Morgan; R Beech
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Identifying and managing inappropriate hospital utilization: a policy synthesis.

Authors:  S M Payne
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Using length of stay and inactive days in the hospital to assess appropriateness of utilisation in Barcelona, Spain.

Authors:  J Alonso; A Muñoz; J M Antó
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Effectiveness of a physician-oriented feedback intervention on inappropriate hospital stays.

Authors:  Pedro Antón; Salvador Peiró; Jesús M Aranaz; Rafael Calpena; Antonio Compañ; Edith Leutscher; Vicenta Ruíz
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  Philippa Davies; Anne E Walker; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Methods of control for hospital quality assurance systems.

Authors:  J D Restuccia; D C Holloway
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Use of hospital beds: a cohort study of admissions to a provincial teaching hospital.

Authors:  P Anderson; J Meara; S Brodhurst; S Attwood; M Timbrell; A Gatherer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-10-08

10.  No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice.

Authors:  A D Oxman; M A Thomson; D A Davis; R B Haynes
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.