Literature DB >> 7043115

Impact of a mandatory second-opinion program on medicaid surgery rates.

S G Martin, M Shwartz, B J Whalen, D D'Arpa, G M Ljung, J H Thorne, A E McKusick.   

Abstract

The effect of the Massachusetts second-opinion program on the volume of elective surgery in the Medicaid population was assessed using two approaches: a study of the program experience and surgery decisions of 2,501 program referrals, and an analysis of Medicaid surgery rates before and after program implementation. Nonconfirmation rates, which averaged 14.5 per cent, varied by procedure from 4 per cent for cholecystectomy to 26 per cent for disc surgery. The patient's surgery decision was related to the outcome of the second-opinion consultation: 85.5 per cent of the confirmed patients had the originally proposed operation, as compared with 31 per cent of the nonconfirmed patients. In the year after program implementation, the program was associated with a 20 per cent reduction in the volume of those procedures covered by the program. The greatest percentage declines were for hysterectomies, meniscectomies, hemorrhoidectomies and tonsillectomies/adenoidectomies. The decline in surgery rates was attributed both to a direct effect on patients referred to the program and to a sentinel effect whereby fewer operations were proposed. We conclude that the mandatory second-opinion program in Massachusetts saved Medicaid $3 to $4 for every dollar spent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7043115     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198201000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  6 in total

Review 1.  Unnecessary surgery.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  A Comparative Study of the Perspectives of General and Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists about the Rate and Value of Second Referral in Assessment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologic Lesions.

Authors:  Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Alireza Liaghatdar; Neda Kargahi
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Seeking a second medical opinion: composition, reasons and perceived outcomes in Israel.

Authors:  Liora Shmueli; Nadav Davidovitch; Joseph S Pliskin; Ran D Balicer; Igal Hekselman; Geva Greenfield
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2017-12-08

4.  Teaching status and resource use for patients with acute myocardial infarction: a new look at the indirect costs of graduate medical education.

Authors:  I S Udvarhelyi; T Rosborough; R P Lofgren; N Lurie; A M Epstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The Value of a Second Opinion for Breast Cancer Patients Referred to a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Designated Cancer Center with a Multidisciplinary Breast Tumor Board.

Authors:  Denise Garcia; Laura S Spruill; Abid Irshad; Jennifer Wood; Denise Kepecs; Nancy Klauber-DeMore
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Medicaid utilization control programs: results of a 1987 study.

Authors:  P A Lindsey
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1989
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.