Literature DB >> 7042201

Prophylaxis of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

C J Friedman, M J Oblinger, P M Suratt, J Bowers, S K Goldberg, M H Sperling, A H Blitzer.   

Abstract

Because approximately 20% of patients receiving mechanical ventilation have upper gastrointestinal bleeding, these patients were prophylatically treated with either antacids, cimetidine, or a placebo in a double-blind randomized fashion. The authors did not titrate gastric acidity because it is a time-consuming process that requires a nasogastric tube. When gastrointestinal bleeding developed in 9 of the 36 patients entered in the study, the treatment code was broken to assess the efficacy of prophylaxis and the frequency of complications. In the antacid group, 5 of the 11 patients were unable to ingest and tolerate their antacids (p less than 0.05 when compared to the control and cimetidine groups). Gastrointestinal bleeding did not occur in any of the six subjects receiving antacids but did occur in one of the 11 subjects receiving cimetidine, in 5 of the 14 control patients, and in 3 of the 5 patients who were unable to tolerate antacids. These differences were not significant. When groups were rearranged, though, there was a significant difference between them. Only 1 of 17 patients receiving medication (antacids or cimetidine) bled, whereas 8 of 19 patients receiving no medications bled (p less than 0.01). The average number of risk factors was not significantly different in the treatment groups. The authors conclude that prophylactic therapy (cimetidine or antacids) given without titration is associated with a lower frequency of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage than when no medication is given. The authors also conclude that more subjects are able to tolerate cimetidine than antacids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7042201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  14 in total

1.  The rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in a general ICU population: a retrospective study.

Authors:  G Gurman; M Samri; B Sarov; J E Bearman; I Heilig
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine for stress ulcer prophylaxis.

Authors:  M J Levy; C B Seelig; N J Robinson; J E Ranney
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Pharmacoeconomic analysis of stress ulcer prophylaxis for critically ill patients.

Authors:  G T Schumock; N P Lam; S R Winkler; S X Kong
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Peptic ulcer complications in high-risk patients.

Authors:  B E Stabile; T M Chang; J R Hiatt; E Passaro
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Antacids revisited: a review of their clinical pharmacology and recommended therapeutic use.

Authors:  P N Maton; M E Burton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Cimetidine prophylaxis for gastrointestinal bleeding in an intensive care unit.

Authors:  A Groll; J B Simon; R D Wigle; K Taguchi; R J Todd; W T Depew
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamin-2 receptor antagonists in adult intensive care patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Marija Barbateskovic; Søren Marker; Anders Granholm; Carl Thomas Anthon; Mette Krag; Janus Christian Jakobsen; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Morten Hylander Møller
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  [Concept of stress ulcer prevention. Is re-thinking necessary?].

Authors:  S Kress; D Schilling; J F Riemann
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1998-08-15

Review 9.  Stress ulcer prophylaxis versus placebo or no prophylaxis in critically ill patients. A systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Mette Krag; Anders Perner; Jørn Wetterslev; Matt P Wise; Morten Hylander Møller
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.

Authors:  R Phillip Dellinger; Mitchell M Levy; Jean M Carlet; Julian Bion; Margaret M Parker; Roman Jaeschke; Konrad Reinhart; Derek C Angus; Christian Brun-Buisson; Richard Beale; Thierry Calandra; Jean-Francois Dhainaut; Herwig Gerlach; Maurene Harvey; John J Marini; John Marshall; Marco Ranieri; Graham Ramsay; Jonathan Sevransky; B Taylor Thompson; Sean Townsend; Jeffrey S Vender; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.