| Literature DB >> 7042029 |
F D Beggs, R S Jobanputra, J T Holmes.
Abstract
In a prospective randomized double-blind trial we have compared oral (n = 46) and parenteral prophylaxis (n = 51) with metronidazole in elective colonic resection. All patients received oral or intravenous metronidazole, together with oral neomycin. The overall infection rate was 11.3 per cent. Six out of 46 patients in the oral group (13 per cent) had a wound infection postoperatively compared with 5 out of 51 patients who received intravenous metronidazole (9.8 per cent). These results suggest that there is no significant difference whether metronidazole is administered intravenously of orally as a prophylactic in elective colonic surgery.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1982 PMID: 7042029 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800690419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Surg ISSN: 0007-1323 Impact factor: 6.939