Literature DB >> 7041812

Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion.

C R Taylor, N C Heglund.   

Abstract

This review addresses a simple question: How do muscles use the energy they consume during terrestrial locomotion? Using a comparative approach, it was found that the mass-specific rate of metabolic energy consumption changes by more than ten-fold with body size, while the mass-specific rate at which the muscles performed mechanical work did not change at all. It was also found that the rate of metabolic energy consumption increased linearly with speed, while the rate at which muscles performed mechanical work increased curvilinearly with speed (oc V1.53). We conclude from these observations that the rate at which animals consume metabolic energy during terrestrial locomotion is not determined by the rate at which their muscles perform mechanical work. Instead, the metabolic cost of generating muscular force over time (integral of F dt) appears to determine the metabolic cost of terrestrial locomotion. The cost of generating force increases with increasing speed and decreases with increasing body size in exactly the same manner as cost of locomotion. It is suggested that the metabolic cost of generating muscular force may be determined by the intrinsic velocity of shortening (i.e proportional to rates at which the cross-bridges between actin and myosin cycle) of the muscle motor units that are active during locomotion. Faster motor units are used both as animals increase speed and in equivalent muscles of smaller animals moving at the same speed. This suggestion is testable and future studies should determine whether or not it explains the higher costs of generating muscular force with increasing speed and decreasing body size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7041812     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ph.44.030182.000525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol        ISSN: 0066-4278            Impact factor:   19.318


  16 in total

Review 1.  An analysis of performance in human locomotion.

Authors:  Guido Ferretti; Aurélien Bringard; Renza Perini
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Can muscle shortening alone, explain the energy cost of muscle contraction in vivo?

Authors:  Jared R Fletcher; Erik M Groves; Ted R Pfister; Brian R Macintosh
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The energetic benefits of tendon springs in running: is the reduction of muscle work important?

Authors:  Natalie C Holt; Thomas J Roberts; Graham N Askew
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Pneumatic Variable Series Elastic Actuator.

Authors:  Hao Zheng; Molei Wu; Xiangrong Shen
Journal:  J Dyn Syst Meas Control       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  In vivo behaviour of human muscle tendon during walking.

Authors:  T Fukunaga; K Kubo; Y Kawakami; S Fukashiro; H Kanehisa; C N Maganaris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Animal galloping and human hopping: an energetics and biomechanics laboratory exercise.

Authors:  Stan L Lindstedt; Patrick M Mineo; Paul J Schaeffer
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 7.  Physiological underpinnings in life-history trade-offs in man's most popular selection experiment: the dog.

Authors:  Ana Gabriela Jimenez
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 2.200

8.  Below thermoneutrality, changes in activity do not drive changes in total daily energy expenditure between groups of mice.

Authors:  Sam Virtue; Patrick Even; Antonio Vidal-Puig
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 27.287

9.  The energetic cost of walking: a comparison of predictive methods.

Authors:  Patricia Ann Kramer; Adam D Sylvester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Differential tissue stiffness of body column facilitates locomotion of Hydra on solid substrates.

Authors:  Suyash Naik; Manu Unni; Devanshu Sinha; Shatruhan Singh Rajput; Puli Chandramouli Reddy; Elena Kartvelishvily; Inna Solomonov; Irit Sagi; Apratim Chatterji; Shivprasad Patil; Sanjeev Galande
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.