Literature DB >> 7039135

Operations for management of esophageal variceal hemorrhage.

L F Rikkers.   

Abstract

Many surgical procedures, including four categories of portal-systemic shunts and a variety of nonshunting operations, have been proposed for patients who bleed from esophagogastric varices. As data have accumulated from clinical trials designed to assess these operations, no single procedure has emerged as ideal for all patients. The urgency of surgical operation, status of hepatic hemodynamics and experience of the surgeon appear to be the most important factors to consider in selecting the appropriate operation for a patient. The timing of the operation with respect to the acute bleeding episode remains controversial. As more effective, conservative methods for temporarily controlling hemorrhage have become available, however, most surgeons now prefer elective procedures because they have lower surgical mortality than emergency intervention. Selective portal-systemic shunts (distal splenorenal shunt and left gastric-vena caval shunt) and nonshunting operations are probably the only procedures that preserve hepatic portal perfusion and thus are less frequently complicated by postoperative encephalopathy than completely diverting shunts. Side-to-side portal-systemic shunts, because they decompress hepatic sinusoids and the splanchnic viscera, are the most effective operations for relieving ascites. None of the available procedures have been proved by controlled trials to be superior to others with respect to long-term postoperative survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7039135      PMCID: PMC1273541     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  95 in total

1.  Conventional splenorenal shunts. A reconsideration.

Authors:  M B Pliam; M A Adson; W T Foulk
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1975-05

2.  Survival in patients with postnecrotic cirrhosis and Laennec's cirrhosis undergoing therapeutic portacaval shunt.

Authors:  G C Kanel; M M Kaplan; J K Zawacki; A D Callow
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Prospective comparative clinical trial with distal splenorenal and mesocaval shunts.

Authors:  F A Reichle; W F Fahmy; M Golsorkhi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  A review of 15 years' experience in the use of sclerotherapy in the control of acute haemorrhage from oesophageal varices.

Authors:  G W Johnston; H W Rodgers
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Angiographic investigations in portal hypertension.

Authors:  M Viamonte; W D Warren; J J Fomon; L O Martinez
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1970-01

6.  A clinical investigation of the portacaval shunt. V. Survival analysis of the therapeutic operation.

Authors:  F C Jackson; E B Perrin; W R Felix; A G Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  The present status of shunts for portal hypertension in cirrhosis.

Authors:  N D Grace; H Muench; T C Chalmers
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1966-05       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Ligation procedures in the management of portal hypertension.

Authors:  A M Cooperman; R E Hermann
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Effect of portasystemic shunt operations on hepatic portal perfusion.

Authors:  L F Rikkers; F J Miller; P Christian
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Portacaval shunt with arterialization of the portal vein by means of a low flow arteriovenous fistula.

Authors:  R J Adamons; K Butt; S Iyer; J DeRose; C R Dennis; M Kinkhabwala; D Gordon; E Martin
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1978-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Eck fistula in animals and humans.

Authors:  T E Starzl; K A Porter; A Francavilla
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 1.909

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.