Literature DB >> 7037148

Histologic grading study of prostate adenocarcinoma: the development of a new system and comparison with other methods--a preliminary study.

P N Brawn, A G Ayala, A C Von Eschenbach, D H Hussey, D E Johnson.   

Abstract

A new grading system for adenocarcinoma of the prostate (MDAH System) and its simplified version, both based on the percentage of tumor that is differentiated (gland-forming) or undifferentiated (non-gland-forming), were compared with the grading systems of Mostofi and Gleason. In a study group of 182 patients with Stage C adenocarcinoma of the prostate, the MDAH system identified 84 patients (46%) as Grade 1, 75 (41%) as Grade 2--3, and 23 (13%) as Grade 4. Kaplan-Meier survival curves predicted a 91% five-year survival for Grade 1 patients, a 60% 5-year survival for Grade 2--3 patients, and a 15% five-year survival for Grade 4 patients. Wilcoxon (Gehan modification) tests showed that the survival was significantly different among Grades 1, 2--3, and 4. The MDAH System is an improvement over other grading systems in that it is a simple, low-power microscopic method that depends only on the percentage of gland formation in the tumor and further reflects the biologic behavior of the tumor as measured by the patient's survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7037148     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820201)49:3<525::aid-cncr2820490321>3.0.co;2-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

1.  Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of WHO and Gleason histologic grading systems in prostatic adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  S O Ozdamar; S Sarikaya; L Yildiz; M K Atilla; B Kandemir; S Yildiz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Immunohistochemical study suggesting a complementary role of kallikreins hK2 and hK3 (prostate-specific antigen) in the functional analysis of human prostate tumors.

Authors:  R R Tremblay; D Deperthes; B Têtu; J Y Dubé
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  STEAP: a prostate-specific cell-surface antigen highly expressed in human prostate tumors.

Authors:  R S Hubert; I Vivanco; E Chen; S Rastegar; K Leong; S C Mitchell; R Madraswala; Y Zhou; J Kuo; A B Raitano; A Jakobovits; D C Saffran; D E Afar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Clinical implications of changing definitions within the Gleason grading system.

Authors:  Tamara L Lotan; Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Prognostic value of histological grading in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Klöppel vs TNM grading.

Authors:  P C Giulianotti; U Boggi; G Fornaciari; J Bruno; G Rossi; D Giardino; G Di Candio; F Mosca
Journal:  Int J Pancreatol       Date:  1995-06

Review 6.  Reproducibility and reliability of tumor grading in urological neoplasms.

Authors:  Rainer Engers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Expression of Zn-alpha 2-glycoprotein and PSP-94 in prostatic adenocarcinoma. An immunohistochemical study of 88 cases.

Authors:  S Gagnon; B Têtu; J Y Dubé; R R Tremblay
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Evaluation of three techniques for differential diagnosis of prostatic needle biopsy specimens.

Authors:  R F McMahon; L J McWilliam; S Mosley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Intratumor cellular heterogeneity and alterations in ras oncogene and p53 tumor suppressor gene in human prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  N Konishi; Y Hiasa; H Matsuda; M Tao; T Tsuzuki; I Hayashi; Y Kitahori; T Shiraishi; R Yatani; J Shimazaki
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 10.  Immunopathological prognostic and predictive factors in prostate cancer.

Authors:  E Sivridis; S Touloupidis; A Giatromanolaki
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.