Literature DB >> 7035930

Mammalian in vivo and in vitro cytogenetic assays: a report of the U.S. EPA's gene-tox program.

R J Preston, W Au, M A Bender, J G Brewen, A V Carrano, J A Heddle, A F McFee, S Wolff, J S Wassom.   

Abstract

This report presents an assessment made by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program's Work Group on mammalian cytogenetics of the clastogenic effects of chemicals in in vivo and in vitro mammalian cell assays. This assessment is based on information provided by the Environmental Mutagen Information Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, with the proviso that the experimental protocol used in these papers was adjudged to be acceptable by standards outlined by the Work Group. Some data were accepted as "qualitative only" because the protocol used was fairly close to that proposed as suitable. Using these criteria, 177 papers were selected for review. 6 assays were reviewed: bone marrow (32 papers, 31 chemicals), spermatogonial (10 papers, 10 chemicals), spermatocyte (25 papers, 25 chemicals), oocyte or early embryo (18 papers, 19 chemicals), in vitro cell culture (30 papers, 66 chemicals), and leukocyte (66 papers, 53 chemicals). Each assay was considered separately, and comparisons were then made between them for their similarities or differences in producing a positive or negative clastogenic effect of a particular chemical or chemical class. A large proportion of the available cytogenetic data was not suitable for inclusion in the final data base because of poor experimental design or unsatisfactory reporting of the information. It was not possible to recommend any one assay for determining potential clastogenicity because each had its own particular advantages and limitations and provided unique information. For demonstrating in vivo effects, the bone-marrow assay is probably the simplest and most economical. If only in vitro exposures were considered, leukocytes or cultured mammalian cell lines would be suitable. However, there are advantages to using leukocytes because they are a synchronous population, at least through their cell division, and because of the ready availability of human cells. In general, there was good agreement between clastogenicity and carcinogenicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7035930     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(81)90030-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  11 in total

1.  Chromosome analysis from peripheral blood lymphocytes of workers after an acute exposure to benzene.

Authors:  M G Clare; A Yardley-Jones; A C Maclean; B J Dean
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1984-05

2.  Organochlorine pesticide accumulation and genotoxicity in Mexican free-tailed bats from Oklahoma and New Mexico.

Authors:  M L Thies; K Thies; K McBee
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Two-year carcinogenicity study of 6-mercaptopurine in F344 rats.

Authors:  A Maekawa; T Nagaoka; H Onodera; Y Matsushima; A Todate; M Shibutani; H Ogasawara; Y Kodama; Y Hayashi
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Amelioration of the cyclophosphamide induced genotoxic damage in mice by the ethanolic extract of Equisetum arvense.

Authors:  Jasbir Kour; Md Niamat Ali; Hilal Ahmad Ganaie; Nahida Tabassum
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2017-05-11

Review 5.  A Novel Strategy to Predict Carcinogenicity of Antiparasitics Based on a Combination of DNA Lesions and Bacterial Mutagenicity Tests.

Authors:  Qianying Liu; Zhixin Lei; Feng Zhu; Awais Ihsan; Xu Wang; Zonghui Yuan
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2017-11-09

6.  Safety evaluation of a novel variant of consensus bacterial phytase.

Authors:  Gregory S Ladics; Kang-Hyun Han; Min S Jang; Heejin Park; Valerie Marshall; Yueming Dersjant-Li; Vincent J Sewalt
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2020-07-15

7.  A Toxicological Evaluation of Methylliberine (Dynamine®).

Authors:  Timothy S Murbach; Róbert Glávits; John R Endres; Amy E Clewell; Gábor Hirka; Adél Vértesi; Erzsébet Béres; Ilona Pasics Szakonyiné
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2019-10-27

8.  Biological monitoring of workers exposed to N-nitrosodiethanolamine in the metal industry.

Authors:  S Monarca; G Scassellati-Sforzolini; F Donato; G Angeli; B Spiegelhalder; C Fatigoni; R Pasquini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Chemical carcinogens: a review of the science and its associated principles. U.S. Interagency Staff Group on Carcinogens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Multiple end point procedure to evaluate risk from pesticides.

Authors:  G Cantelli-Forti; M Paolini; P Hrelia
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.