Literature DB >> 7033575

Protection against endometrial carcinoma by combination-product oral contraceptives.

B S Hulka, L E Chambless, D G Kaufman, W C Fowler, B G Greenberg.   

Abstract

Seventy-nine patients with endometrial carcinoma were compared with 203 control subjects regarding their use of combination-product oral contraceptives (OCs). Overall, 6.3% of patients and 15.3% of control subjects had used these products. The risk of endometrial cancer for users of OCs was less than half the risk for nonusers. Five years or more of use reduced the risk to a third. Recent users were strongly protected, whereas discontinuation resulted in risks returning to those of nonusers. Furthermore, OCs with predominantly progestational effects of intermediate formulations produced greater protection than those with predominantly estrogens. This pattern of results is biologically consistent with a protective effect of combination-product OCs against endometrial carcinoma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Factors; Americas; Cancer; Case Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Control Groups; Developed Countries; Diabetes Mellitus; Diseases; Endometrial Cancer; Ethnic Groups; Family Planning; Hypertension; Neoplasms; North America; North Carolina; Northern America; Obesity; Oral Contraceptives, Combined; Oral Contraceptives--side effects; Parity; Research Methodology; Studies; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7033575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  11 in total

1.  Genistein effects on stromal cells determines epithelial proliferation in endometrial co-cultures.

Authors:  Brante P Sampey; Terrence D Lewis; Claire S Barbier; Liza Makowski; David G Kaufman
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.362

2.  Recent time trends in uterine cancer.

Authors:  V Persky; F Davis; R Barrett; E Ruby; C Sailer; P Levy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Exogenous hormones in the aetiology of cancer in women.

Authors:  M P Vessey
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Sex hormones and gynaecological cancer.

Authors:  J S Scott
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-06-05

Review 5.  The relationship between oral contraceptive use, cancer and vascular disease.

Authors:  C La Vecchia; S Franceschi; P Bruzzi; F Parazzini; P Boyle
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Comparative analysis of the uterine and mammary gland effects of drospirenone and medroxyprogesterone acetate.

Authors:  Christiane Otto; Iris Fuchs; Helga Altmann; Mario Klewer; Alexander Walter; Katja Prelle; Richardus Vonk; Karl-Heinrich Fritzemeier
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 4.736

7.  Recency, duration, and progestin content of oral contraceptives in relation to the incidence of endometrial cancer (Washington, USA).

Authors:  L F Voigt; Q Deng; N S Weiss
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Exogenous Hormone Use and Endometrial Cancer in U.S. Black Women.

Authors:  Todd R Sponholtz; Julie R Palmer; Lynn A Rosenberg; Elizabeth E Hatch; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Hormones and breast and endometrial cancers: preventive strategies and future research.

Authors:  B S Hulka; L A Brinton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Norgestrel and gestodene stimulate breast cancer cell growth through an oestrogen receptor mediated mechanism.

Authors:  W H Catherino; M H Jeng; V C Jordan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.