Literature DB >> 7033568

Evolution of the rectal bladder as a method for urinary diversion.

M A Ghoneim, A B Shehab-El-Din, A K Ashamallah, M A Gaballah.   

Abstract

A critical analysis of previous reports reveals 2 main drawbacks of the rectal bladder: 1) recurrent pyelonephritis with subsequent loss of renal function (30 per cent) and 2) nocturnal urinary leakage (40 per cent). In a randomized prospective study the role of a submucosal tunnel for prevention of reflux was evaluated. We demonstrated objectively that this technique could provide a patent unidirectional flow of urine in the majority of cases (82.5 per cent). Urodynamic measurements, including flowmetry, rectal pressure and anal electromyography activities, indicated that the driving force for voiding is the voluntary increase of the intra-abdominal pressure rather than the intrinsic contractions of the smooth muscles of the rectum. Accordingly, attempts at control of nocturnal urinary leakage were directed towards increasing the resistance offered by the pelvic floor. The efficiency of imipramine hydrochloride to achieve this goal was tested against a placebo in a clinical trial performed in a prospective randomized fashion. This treatment was effective in the control of enuresis in a significant number of patients (75 per cent). We conclude that the rectal bladder with a terminal colostomy is a highly recommended method for permanent urinary diversion when these 2 modifications are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7033568     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54724-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Continent urinary diversion in childhood: European experience.

Authors:  R Hohenfellner
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Urinary diversion and bladder reconstruction/replacement using intestinal segments for intractable incontinence or following cystectomy.

Authors:  June D Cody; Ghulam Nabi; Norman Dublin; Samuel McClinton; David E Neal; Robert Pickard; Sze M Yong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

3.  The sigma rectum pouch (Mainz pouch II).

Authors:  M Fisch; R Wammack; R Hohenfellner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Continent diversion with the Mainz pouch.

Authors:  A Lampel; M Fisch; R Stein; D Schultz-Lampel; M Hohenfellner; C Eggersmann; R Hohenfellner; J W Thüroff
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Clinical evaluation of patients treated with a detubularised isolated ureterosigmoidostomy diversion after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Mohammed A Atta; Tamer M Abou Youssif; Ahmed F Kotb
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2014-06-03

6.  Outcome of Mainz II Pouch Urinary Diversion after Radical Cystectomy in Patients with Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Our Experience.

Authors:  Stephen Odunayo Ikuerowo; Olufemi O Ojewuyi; Muftau Jimoh Bioku; Abimbola Ayodeji Abolarinwa; Olufunmilade Akinfolarin Omisanjo
Journal:  Niger J Surg       Date:  2018 Jan-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.