| Literature DB >> 7030578 |
L H Wilkins, S R Winternitz, S Oparil, L R Smith, H P Dustan.
Abstract
The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lofexidine, a centrally acting imidazoline derivative, were compared to that of clonidine in a randomized double-blind trial in 28 patients with moderate essential hypertension. The study consisted of a washout phase, a placebo phase, a drug titration phase (0.2 to 1.6 mg/day, with hydrochlorothiazide added at 0.4 mg daily for supine and erect diastolic blood pressure above 90 mm Hg), and a maintenance phase lasting 3 mo. During the titration phase supine systolic and diastolic pressures fell in lofexidine patients from 143 +/- 4/98 +/- 3 to 122 +/- 3/81 +/- 2 mm Hg and in clonidine patients from 154 +/- 6/101 +/- 2 to 124 +/- 4/81 +/- 2 mm Hg (P less than 0.01), and erect systolic and diastolic pressures fell in lofexidine patients from 143 +/- 3/105 +/- 2 to 116 +/- 3/85 +/- 2 mm Hg and in clonidine patients from 156 +/- 6/104 +/- 2 to 117 +/- 4/82 +/- 2 mm Hg (P less than 0.01). Maximal doses of lofexidine and clonidine in combination with hydrochlorothiazide had equivalent antihypertensive effects, but when the effects of lofexidine and clonidine were compared at each dose level, larger doses of lofexidine patients in either the supine or erect position during the titration phase but heart rate fell in the clonidine patients (P less than 0.05) over the same period. Dry mouth and drowsiness were reported in both groups but were both less frequent and less severe in the lofexidine group than the clonidine group.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1981 PMID: 7030578 DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1981.234
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther ISSN: 0009-9236 Impact factor: 6.875