Literature DB >> 7029265

Use of the mouse spot test in chemical mutagenesis: interpretation of past data and recommendations for future work.

L B Russell, P B Selby, E von Halle, W Sheridan, L Valcovic.   

Abstract

The mouse spot test, developed 23 years ago, is an in vivo assay capable of detecting genetic effects of several kinds, including intragenic mutations, minute deficiencies, deletions (through breakage or nondisjunction) of various amounts of chromosomal material, and somatic crossing-over. The method involves exposing embryos that are heterozygous for a number of coat-color markers to the test agent, and, 3 weeks later, looking for clones of mutant cells, i.e., spots of color expressing the recessive marker in an otherwise black fur. Spots having other causes may also be induced, specifically white midventral spots due to cytotoxic effects, and certain spots resulting from misdifferentiation. Spot-test results have, to date, been reported from 7 laboratories. Because the control results for any one cross and solvent were found to be reasonably consistent between the laboratories, we pooled these to develop a "historical" control with which experimental results for the same cross and solvent were compared. Experimental results were classified as positive, negative, or inconclusive on the basis of a multiple-decision procedure produced by the testing of the following 2 hypotheses: (1) the mutation frequency (induced + spontaneous) in treated mice is not higher than the mutation frequency in the appropriate pooled control, and (2) the induced mutation frequency of the treated mice is no less than 4 times as high as the observed mutation frequency in the appropriate pooled control. Each hypothesis was tested at the 5% significance level. To date, 30 substances have been employed in the spot test, including 3 that are solvents for some of the others. Of the remaining 27 (26 compounds and 1 mixture), 16 were positive, 6 negative, and 5 inconclusive. The 26 compounds fell into 27 chemical classifications (using a system provided for use by the GENE-TOX program). The inadequacies in the design and reporting of some past experiments indicate a need for a carefully specified protocol. When properly done, the spot test will fulfill a useful role in mutagenicity testing programs because (1) it is an in vivo mammalian assay, (2) it detects genetic effects of many kinds, and (3) it is relatively rapid. Since the test appears well suited to the identification of potent mutagens, its main value should be in screening large numbers of substances and singling out the potentially worst offenders to be further studied in germ-line mutagenesis tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7029265     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(81)90011-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  10 in total

Review 1.  Present state and future perspectives of using pluripotent stem cells in toxicology research.

Authors:  Anna M Wobus; Peter Löser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  A model system for analyzing somatic mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ana Maria Garcia; Anastasia Derventzi; Rita Busuttil; R Brent Calder; Ernesto Perez; Linda Chadwell; Martijn E T Dollé; Martha Lundell; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Carcinogens induce reversion of the mouse pink-eyed unstable mutation.

Authors:  R H Schiestl; J Aubrecht; F Khogali; N Carls
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Age- and temperature-dependent somatic mutation accumulation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ana Maria Garcia; R Brent Calder; Martijn E T Dollé; Martha Lundell; Pankaj Kapahi; Jan Vijg
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Spontaneous mitotic homologous recombination at an enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (EYFP) cDNA direct repeat in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Carrie A Hendricks; Karen H Almeida; Molly S Stitt; Vidya S Jonnalagadda; Rebecca E Rugo; G Foster Kerrison; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Reporter genes in transgenic mice.

Authors:  C Cui; M A Wani; D Wight; J Kopchick; P J Stambrook
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 7.  Genome instability, cancer and aging.

Authors:  Alexander Y Maslov; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-03-31

8.  The mouse spot test: results with a new cross.

Authors:  J Hart
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Mutagenicity testing with transgenic mice. Part II: Comparison with the mouse spot test.

Authors:  Ulrich Wahnschaffe; Annette Bitsch; Janet Kielhorn; Inge Mangelsdorf
Journal:  J Carcinog       Date:  2005-01-27

Review 10.  Chemical carcinogens: a review of the science and its associated principles. U.S. Interagency Staff Group on Carcinogens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.