Literature DB >> 7028258

Chemotherapy for inoperable, non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma: EST 2575, generation II.

J C Ruckdeschel, C R Mehta, O M Salazar, M Cohen, S Vogl, L S Koons, H Lerner.   

Abstract

Between 1976 and 1978 the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group tested ten regimens in 415 patients with histologically documented, inoperable non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma. Most patients were ambulatory (69%) and had extensive disease (69%). Patients were stratified by cell type: squamous cell carcinoma (SQ), large cell anaplastic carcinoma (LC), or adenocarcinoma (AD). Ineffective single agents (including cell types tested and percent complete and partial responses) were dactinomycin (SQ, 6%), dianhydrogalactitol (SQ, 0), ftorafur (AD and LC, 3%), and piperazinedione (AD and LC, 7%), Ineffective combination regimens included the contemporary standard regimen cyclophosphamide (CYT) plus CCNU (SQ, AD, and LC, 9%), methotrexate plus doxorubicin (ADR) plus CYT plus CCNU (MAC) (SQ and AD, 12%), and mitolactol plus ADR (AD and LC, 8%). When compared to CYT plus CCNU the following regimens demonstrated significant activity: CYT plus bleomycin plus cisplatin (SQ, 23%; P = 0.02) and ADR plus 5-FU plus cisplatin (AD and LC, 24%; P = 0.006). Mitomycin demonstrated marginal activity in squamous cell cancer (19%, P = 0.06). Neither "active" regimen improved survival although responders to any regimen had a significant prolongation of median survival (31.6 vs 15.7 weeks, P = 0.002). The MACC regimen, piperazinedione, and mitomycin were substantially more toxic than the two effective regimens, which were adequately tolerated. Ambulatory performance status, limited disease, and prior surgery were significant positive prognostic variables whereas prior radiation and pretreatment weight loss adversely affected response or survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7028258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep        ISSN: 0361-5960


  5 in total

Review 1.  Combination chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. A review.

Authors:  J B Sørensen; H H Hansen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Ifosfamide, mitomycin and radiotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  S D Chetiyawardana; M H Cullen; R C Joshi; C M Woodroffe
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Single-agent chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. A review.

Authors:  J B Sørensen; M Clerici; H H Hansen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  A phase II study of cisplatin, vindesine and continuously infused 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Osaka Lung Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group.

Authors:  T Nakano; H Ikegami; S Nakamura; T Kawase; H Nishikawa; S Yokota; M Yoshida; T Tachibana; T Igarashi; K Komuta; K Higashino
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  The role of mitomycin in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the literature.

Authors:  J P Sculier; L Ghisdal; T Berghmans; F Branle; J J Lafitte; F Vallot; A P Meert; F Lemaitre; E Steels; A Burniat; C Mascaux
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.