Literature DB >> 7014153

Rejected human corneal grafts. I. Clinical study.

C C Kok-van Alphen, H J Völker-Dieben, J J van der Want, G Vrensen.   

Abstract

As introduction to a light- and electron-microscopial examination of rejected human corneal grafts a summary is given of the clinical signs of rejection. It is extremely important to recognize these signs in time and to initiate the correct therapy. Most failures in corneal transplantation are due to rejection. Rejection reactions are often not recognized early enough. The differential diagnosis is difficult because so many factors can trigger off a rejection. As the diagnosis is so often missed it is a good thing to consider the clinical picture of graft rejection once more. Maumenee: 'most ophthalmologists do not recognize the signs of early graft failure and usually do not refer the patient back for therapy until considerable oedema has developed from endothelial destruction' (1962). In the cases with a good prognosis the rejection percentage is plus or minus 12%; in vascularized corneas and complicated corneal transplantations as high as 75% (Polack, 1977).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7014153     DOI: 10.1007/bf00158009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  9 in total

1.  Induction of corneal graft rejection by passive cell transfer.

Authors:  A A Khodadoust; A M Silverstein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-02

2.  Clinical aspects of the corneal homograft reaction.

Authors:  A E MAUMENEE
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1962-04

3.  The influence of donor-recipient sensitization on corneal grafts.

Authors:  A E MAUMENEE
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1951-05       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  [Allograft rejection reactions after keratoplasty (author's transl)].

Authors:  R Sundmacher
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  [HLA antigens and allograft reaction in keratoconus (author's transl)].

Authors:  S Vannas; A Vannas; K Karjalainen
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 0.700

6.  Graft reactions after keratoplasty for keratoconus.

Authors:  J W Chandler; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  The fine structural changes in the corneal endothelium during graft rejection.

Authors:  H Inomata; G K Smelser; F M Polack
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-04

8.  Fine structure of regenerating endothelium and Descemet's membrane in normal and rejecting corneal grafts.

Authors:  H Inomata; G K Smelser; F M Polack
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  [Clinical aspects of the immunitary reactions after transfixing keratoplasty in man].

Authors:  G Offret; Y Pouliquen; D Guyot
Journal:  Arch Ophtalmol Rev Gen Ophtalmol       Date:  1970-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.