Literature DB >> 7010142

Modeling the Ames test.

A G Stead, V Hasselblad, J P Creason, L Claxton.   

Abstract

Despite the value and widespread use of the Ames test, little attention has been focused on standardizing quantitative methods of analyzing these data. In this paper, a realistic and statistically tractable model is developed for the evaluation of Ames-type data. The model assumes revertant colony formation at any dose follows a Poisson process, while the mean number of revertants per plate is a nonlinear function of up to 4 parameters. An exponential decay term can be included in the model to adjust for toxicity. The resultant system of nonlinear equations is solved using a modified Gauss-Newton iterative scheme to obtain maximum likelihood estimates of the model parameters. Significance of the key parameters is tested by fitting reduced models and using likelihood ratio tests. The model's performance is demonstrated on data from organic extracts of various environmental contaminants. Among the advantages of the proposed model are (1) no data is discarded in the parameter estimation process, (2) no arbitrary constants need to be added to zero counts or doses, and (3) no mathematical transformation of the data is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7010142     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1161(81)90282-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  9 in total

1.  Statistical analysis of the Ames Salmonella/microsome test.

Authors:  B H Margolin; N Kaplan; E Zeiger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The Salmonella mutagenicity assay: the stethoscope of genetic toxicology for the 21st century.

Authors:  Larry D Claxton; Gisela de A Umbuzeiro; David M DeMarini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Nonparametric regression analysis of data from the Ames mutagenicity assay.

Authors:  J B Cologne; N E Breslow
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Statistical evaluation of mutagenicity test data: recommendations of the U.K. Environmental Mutagen Society.

Authors:  D J Kirkland
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Evaluation of the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of motor vehicle emissions in short-term bioassays.

Authors:  J Lewtas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Genotoxicity of bioremediated soils from the Reilly Tar site, St. Louis Park, Minnesota.

Authors:  T J Hughes; L D Claxton; L Brooks; S Warren; R Brenner; F Kremer
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  3D-QSAR, ADME-Tox, and molecular docking of semisynthetic triterpene derivatives as antibacterial and insecticide agents.

Authors:  Ossama Daoui; Noureddine Mazoir; Mohamed Bakhouch; Mohammed Salah; Ahmed Benharref; Azucena Gonzalez-Coloma; Souad Elkhattabi; Mohamed El Yazidi; Samir Chtita
Journal:  Struct Chem       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 1.795

Review 8.  Chemical carcinogens: a review of the science and its associated principles. U.S. Interagency Staff Group on Carcinogens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Mouse skin tumor initiation-promotion and complete carcinogenesis bioassays: mechanisms and biological activities of emission samples.

Authors:  S Nesnow; L L Triplett; T J Slaga
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.