Literature DB >> 7007428

Enzyme immunoassay for detection of antibody-coated bacteria.

W E Stamm, B E Cutter, G A Grootes-Reuvecamp.   

Abstract

To quantitatively evaluate factors potentially affecting antibody coating of bacteria in urine, we developed an assay with enzyme-linked rather than fluorescein-conjugated immunoglobulin. Using the enzyme immunoassay (EIA) in an in vitro system in which concentrations of serotype O44 Escherichia coli and antibody titer to E. coli Orr O44 O antigen were known, we compared specimens run in parallel with a fluorescent antibody (FA) assay. At greater than or equal to 10(5) bacteria per ml, antibody titer to homologous O antigen correlated directly with absorbance in the EIA. Both tests had sensitivities exceeding 95% in specimens containing greater than or equal to 10(5) bacteria per ml, but the FA test detected 23 of 27 positive specimens with less than 10(5) bacteria per ml compared with 21 of 43 detected by EIA (P = 0.002). However, nonspecific fluorescence caused false positives in 8% of negative tests run by FA compared with 1% of simultaneous EIA tests (P = 0.05). pH alterations and pretreatment of bacteria with antibiotics did not affect either test. Heterologous E. coli strains showed no cross-reactivity with O44 antiserum, but all Staphylococcus aureus isolates tested caused false positives in both assays, and one Klebsiella strain repeatedly caused a false-positive FA assay. The EIA appears to be a simple, quantitative, and specific technique for detection of antibody-coated bacteria in this experimental system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7007428      PMCID: PMC273717          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.13.1.42-45.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  Significance of antibody-coated bacteria in urinary sediment in experimental pyelonephritis.

Authors:  J W Smith; S R Jones; B Kaijser
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Localization of urinary-tract infections by detection of antibody-coated bacteria in urine sediment.

Authors:  S R Jones; J W Smith; J P Sanford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Elisa. 3. Quantitation of specific antibodies by enzyme-labeled anti-immunoglobulin in antigen-coated tubes.

Authors:  E Engvall; P Perlmann
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  [Localization of urinary-tract infection by demonstrating antibody-coated bacteria in urine (author's transl)].

Authors:  W Kohnle; E Vanek; K Federlin; H E Franz
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1975-12-19       Impact factor: 0.628

5.  Antibody coating of urinary bacteria: relation to site of infection and invasion of uroepithelium.

Authors:  G Riedasch; E Ritz; K Möhring; J Bommer
Journal:  Clin Nephrol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 0.975

6.  Urinary tract infection localization in women.

Authors:  G K Harding; T J Marrie; A R Ronald; S Hoban; P Muir
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Efficacy of single-dose and conventional amoxicillin therapy in urinary-tract infection localized by the antibody-coated bacteria technic.

Authors:  L S Fang; N E Tolkoff-Rubin; R H Rubin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Accuracy of antibody-coated-bacteria test in recurrent urinary tract infections.

Authors:  N J Hawthorne; S B Kurtz; J P Anhalt; J W Segura
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 7.616

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary tract infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1982-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.