Literature DB >> 7006134

Effects of bone wax on bacterial clearance.

P Johnson, D Fromm.   

Abstract

The hemostatic benefit of bone wax placed in cancellous bone occurs at the expense of the wax persisting at the bony site for years. As such, bone wax appears to act as a foreign body. This study examines the effect of bone wax on the ability of cancellous bone to clear bacteria. The iliac crest of rabbits was penetrated to a standard depth with an 18-gauge needle. Subsequently, nothing or Staphylococcus aureus, 10(5) colony-forming units, was innoculated in the needle site and followed by the subcortical placement of a cylinder of bone wax or similarly sized stainless steel rod. Ten days later, the site of bony penetration was excised and cultured. Eighty percent of animals whose bone was implanted with bacteria and bone wax together had positive cultures. Forty percent of animals whose bone was implanted with bacteria and a steel rod also had positive cultures. The difference between these groups (bacteria with bone wax or with steel rod) was not statistically significant. However, these combinations of bacteria with foreign body were significantly different from the bacteria only or bone wax only or steel rod only groups in which no positive cultures were observed. The data indicate that bone wax significantly impairs the ability of cancellous bone of rabbits to clear a standard inoculum of S. aureus. This effect appears to be the same as that observed with a different but similarly sized foreign body (steel rod).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7006134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  9 in total

Review 1.  The use of local agents: bone wax, gelatin, collagen, oxidized cellulose.

Authors:  Claudio Schonauer; Enrico Tessitore; Giuseppe Barbagallo; Vincenzo Albanese; Aldo Moraci
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does bone wax induce a chronic inflammatory articular reaction?

Authors:  Lucian B Solomon; Carlos Guevara; Lorenz Büchler; Donald W Howie; Roger W Byard; Martin Beck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Ostene, a new alkylene oxide copolymer bone hemostatic material, does not inhibit bone healing.

Authors:  Clara E Magyar; Tara L Aghaloo; Elisa Atti; Sotirios Tetradis
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Bone healing after median sternotomy: a comparison of two hemostatic devices.

Authors:  Rikke F Vestergaard; Henrik Jensen; Stefan Vind-Kezunovic; Thomas Jakobsen; Kjeld Søballe; John M Hasenkam
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 1.637

Review 5.  Biologic response of local hemostatic agents used in endodontic microsurgery.

Authors:  Youngjune Jang; Hyeon Kim; Byoung-Duck Roh; Euiseong Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-03-21

6.  Analysis of bone healing with a novel bone wax substitute compared with bone wax in a porcine bone defect model.

Authors:  Tristan Tham; Keith Roberts; John Shanahan; John Burban; Peter Costantino
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2018-07-26

Review 7.  Translation of bone wax and its substitutes: History, clinical status and future directions.

Authors:  Huan Zhou; Jun Ge; Yanjie Bai; Chunyong Liang; Lei Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Infection rates and healing using bone wax and a soluble polymer material.

Authors:  Tadeusz Wellisz; Yuehuei H An; Xuejun Wen; Qian Kang; Christopher M Hill; Jonathan K Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Can bone wax cause cholesterol granuloma in the petrous apex? A case report.

Authors:  Eugene Hung Chih Wong; Chee Chean Lim; Cheng Ai Ong; Prepageran Narayanan
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-06-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.