Literature DB >> 7005265

Effects of corticosteroids on eosinophil chemotaxis and adherence.

L C Altman, J S Hill, W M Hairfield, M F Mullarkey.   

Abstract

Therapeutic doses of corticosteroids frequently induce eosinopenia; however, the mechanism(s) involved remain obscure. To investigate this question, we studied the effects of corticosteroids on eosinophil adherence and migration. Eosinophils from normal donors were prepared by dextran sedimentation and Hypaque gradient centrifugation to 45-96% purity. Adherence was measured by filtration of whole blood and isolated eosinophils through nylon wool columns. Before prednisone administration, adherence was 83.8+/-3.2% for eosinophils in heparinized blood and 82.1+/-3.2% for isolated eosinophils. 4 h after oral prednisone administration whole blood eosinophil adherence was reduced to 53.9+/-10.7%; at 24 and 48 h adherence was normal. In contrast, isolated eosinophils showed no decrease in adherence 4, 24, or 48 h after corticosteroid administration. Similarly, in vitro addition of hydrocortisone to isolated eosinophils at 0.01 and 2.0 mg/ml did not reduce adherence. Eosinophil migration was tested in modified Boyden chambers by "lower-surface" and "leading-front" methods, using zymosan-activated serum and buffered saline to assess chemotactic and random migration, respectively. In vitro incubation of eosinophils with hydrocortisone or methylprednisolone produced a dose-dependent inhibition of chemotaxis. Using lower-surface methods the minimal concentration effecting substantial inhibition was 0.01 mg/ml for both drugs. At 2.0 mg/ml hydrocortisone and methylprednisolone inhibited eosinophil chemotaxis 82.6+/-4.4% and 85.0+/-3.5%, respectively. Using leading-front chemotaxis techniques significant inhibition was detected at 0.001 mg/ml hydrocortisone. Eosinophils incubated and washed free of corticosteroids responded normally to chemoattractants, indicating that the inhibitory effect of these drugs was reversible. Hydrocortisone at 2 mg/ml inhibited random eosinophil migration, although this effect was not apparent at lower concentrations. Corticosteroids did not act as chemotactic factor inactivators and were not toxic as measured by trypan blue exclusion. Eosinophils obtained from donors who had received 40 mg of prednisone orally for four days showed normal chemotactic responses, probably reflecting the fact that the cells were washed free of plasma before testing. In contrast, incubation of eosinophils in plasma from donors who had received a 300-mg bolus of hydrocortisone induced 46.1+/-4.5% more inhibition of chemotaxis than did incubation in normal plasma. These results indicate that: (a) eosinophil adherence is transiently reduced following in vivo corticosteroid administration, (b) eosinophil chemotaxis is inhibited by both in vitro and in vivo administration of corticosteroids, and (c) the chemotaxis inhibiting effect is nontoxic, cell-directed, dose-dependent and reversible. Inhibition of eosinophil adherence and chemotaxis may in part explain how corticosteroids produce eosinopenia and decrease the local accumulation of eosinophils.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7005265      PMCID: PMC371568          DOI: 10.1172/JCI110024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  29 in total

Review 1.  Abnormalities of leukocyte chemotaxis in human disease.

Authors:  R Snyderman; M C Pike; L C Altman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1975-06-13       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  A STUDY OF CELLULAR RESPONSES IN IMMUNE REACTIONS UTILIZING THE SKIN WINDOW TECHNIQUE. I. IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS.

Authors:  D EIDINGER; R WILKINSON; B ROSE
Journal:  J Allergy       Date:  1964 Jan-Feb

3.  Studies of the influence of cortisone and hydrocortisone of human leukocytes in culture and in eosinophilic leukemia.

Authors:  M L KRIPPAEHNE; E E OSGOOD
Journal:  Acta Haematol       Date:  1955-03       Impact factor: 2.195

4.  The mechanism of glucocorticoid eosinopenia; contribution to the physiology of eosinophile granulocytes.

Authors:  A F ESSELLIER; R L JEANNERET; L MORANDI
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1954-05       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Effect of horse serum, adrenal hormones, and histamine on the number of eosinophils in the blood and peritoneal fluid of mice.

Authors:  H PANZENHAGEN; R SPEIRS
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1953-06       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  The accumulation of eosinophils and basophils at skin sites as related to intensity of skin reactivity and symptoms in atopic disease.

Authors:  A B Felarca; F C Lowell
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 10.793

7.  Histologic studies of human skin test responses to ragweed, compound 48-80, and histamine.

Authors:  P Atkins; G R Green; B Zweiman
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Leukocytes and hypersensitivity reactions. I. Eosinophil response in skin window to ragweed extract, histamine, and compound 48/80 in atopic and nonatopic individuals.

Authors:  A R Feinberg; S M Feinberg; F Lee
Journal:  J Allergy       Date:  1967-08

9.  Inhibition of eosinophilotaxis by chloroquine and corticosteroids.

Authors:  C A Gauderer; G J Gleich
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1978-01

10.  In vitro and in vivo activity of a lymphocyte and immune complex-dependent chemotactic factor for eosinophils.

Authors:  S Cohen; P A Ward
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1971-01-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  The role of eosinophils in asthma.

Authors:  C Kroegel
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.584

2.  The effect of 2 weeks treatment with cetirizine on bronchial reactivity to methacholine in asthma.

Authors:  J P Finnerty; S T Holgate; J P Rihoux
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Eosinophils: a review.

Authors:  B J McEwen
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 4.  Immunosuppressive drugs in inflammatory bowel disease. A review of their mechanisms of efficacy and place in therapy.

Authors:  A B Hawthorne; C J Hawkey
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Glucocorticoids inhibit granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-1 and interleukin-5 enhanced in vitro survival of human eosinophils.

Authors:  M P Hallsworth; T M Litchfield; T H Lee
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.397

6.  Heterogeneity of human eosinophil glucocorticoid receptor expression in hypereosinophilic patients: absence of detectable receptor correlates with resistance to corticotherapy.

Authors:  L Prin; P Lefebvre; V Gruart; M Capron; L Storme; P Formstecher; S Loiseau; A Capron
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Rat eosinophil-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity: investigations of the mechanisms of target cell lysis and inhibition by glucocorticoids.

Authors:  C Hallam; D I Pritchard; S Trigg; R P Eady
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  C3a is a chemotaxin for human eosinophils but not for neutrophils. I. C3a stimulation of neutrophils is secondary to eosinophil activation.

Authors:  P J Daffern; P H Pfeifer; J A Ember; T E Hugli
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 14.307

9.  Cyclosporin A increases the pulmonary eosinophilia induced by inhaled Aspergillus antigen in mice.

Authors:  J M Wang; M Denis; M Fournier; M Laviolette
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Mechanisms for eosinophil degranulation; release of the eosinophil cationic protein.

Authors:  I Winqvist; T Olofsson; I Olsson
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 7.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.