Literature DB >> 7002578

Specific methods for theophylline assay in biological samples.

L E Edholm.   

Abstract

The objective of monitoring theophylline plasma levels in therapeutic work is well established, and the consequences of using unspecific analytical methods are obvious. For the determination of pharmacokinetic parameters, concentrations far below the therapeutic range must often be measured. Interferences acceptable in therapeutic monitoring of theophylline could cause severe inaccuracy at these drug levels. The term specificity and its meaning are discussed in general and in relation to the different steps of the analytical procedure (e.g., sampling and sample work-up). Different analytical methods for theophylline are discussed in terms of specificity. Plasma concentrations of paraxanthine (1,7-dimethylxanthine)--a metabolite of caffeine--as high as 3 microgram/ml have been observed, and the compound can interfere in various theophylline assay methods. An example is given of the pharmacokinetic consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7002578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis Suppl        ISSN: 0106-4347


  5 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of theophylline and enprofylline in patients requiring a high or low dose of theophylline.

Authors:  L C Laursen; N Johannesson; B Weeke
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Increase in plasma free fatty acids and natriuresis by xanthines may reflect adenosine antagonism.

Authors:  K E Andersson; N Johannesson; B Karlberg; C G Persson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Effects of enprofylline, a xanthine lacking adenosine receptor antagonism, in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease.

Authors:  E Lunell; N Svedmyr; K E Andersson; C G Persson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Maximally effective plasma concentrations of enprofylline and theophylline during constant infusion.

Authors:  L C Laursen; N Johannesson; I Søndergaard; B Weeke
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Comparison of oral enprofylline and theophylline in asthmatic patients.

Authors:  L C Laursen; N Johannesson; I Søndergaard; B Weeke
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.