Literature DB >> 7000746

Differential effects of ethanol and hexanol on the Escherichia coli cell envelope.

L O Ingram, N S Vreeland.   

Abstract

Both ethanol and hexanol inhibited the growth of Escherichia coli, but their effects on the organization and composition of the cell envelope were quite different. Hexanol (7.8 x 10(-3) mM) increased membrane fluidity, whereas ethanol (0.67 M) had little effect. During growth in the presence of ethanol, the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids increased. The opposite change was induced by hexanol. Unlike hexanol, growth in the presence of ethanol resulted in the production of un-cross-linked peptidoglycan with subsequent lysis. Salt (0.3 M) protected cells against ethanol-induced lysis but potentiated growth inhibition by hexanol. Mutants isolated for resistance to ethanol-induced lysis synthesized cross-linked peptidoglycan during growth in the presence of ethanol but remained sensitive to hexanol. A general hypothesis was presented to explain the differential effects of ethanol and hexanol. All alcohols are viewed as similar in having both an apolar chain capable of interacting with hydrophobic environments and a hydroxyl function capable of hydrogen bonding. The differential effects of short-chain alcohols may represent effects due to the high molar concentrations of hydrogen bonding groups with an apolar end within the environment. These may replace bound water in some cases. With longer-chain alcohols such as hexanol, the effects of the acyl chain would dominate, and limitations of solubility and cellular integrity would mask these hydroxyl effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7000746      PMCID: PMC294694          DOI: 10.1128/jb.144.2.481-488.1980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  36 in total

1.  RELATION BETWEEN THE CHEMICAL CONSTITUTION AND GERMICIDAL ACTIVITY OF THE MONOHYDRIC ALCOHOLS AND PHENOLS.

Authors:  F W Tilley; J M Schaffer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1926-11       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Inhibition of growth of Aerobacter aerogenes; the mode of action of phenols, alcohols, acetone, and ethyl acetate.

Authors:  S DAGLEY; E A DAWES; G A MORRISON
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Lipid fluidity-dependent biosynthesis and assembly of the outer membrane proteins of E. coli.

Authors:  J M DiRienzo; M Inouye
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Cellular division of penicillin-induced filaments of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J Stárka; J Moravová
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 2.099

5.  Biosynthesis of the peptidoglycan of bacterial cell walls. XII. Inhibition of cross-linking by penicillins and cephalosporins: studies in Staphylococcus aureus in vivo.

Authors:  D J Tipper; J L Strominger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1968-06-10       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Intrinsic perturbing ability of alkanols in lipid bilayers.

Authors:  M K Jain; J Gleeson; A Upreti; G C Upreti
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1978-05-04

7.  Changes in lipid composition of Escherichia coli resulting from growth with organic solvents and with food additives.

Authors:  L O Ingram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  A membrane enzyme from Staphylococcus aureus which catalyzes transpeptidase, carboxypeptidase, and penicillinase activities.

Authors:  J W Kozarich; J L Strominger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1978-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Alteration of the fatty acid composition of Escherichia coli by growth in the presence of normal alcohols.

Authors:  K H Sullivan; G D Hegeman; E H Cordes
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Cell division mutations in the blue-green bacterium Agmenellum quadruplicatum strain BG1: a comparison of the cell wall.

Authors:  L O Ingram; C Van Baalen; W D Fisher
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  26 in total

1.  Fermentation of d-Xylose and l-Arabinose to Ethanol by Erwinia chrysanthemi.

Authors:  J S Tolan; R K Finn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  uspB, a new sigmaS-regulated gene in Escherichia coli which is required for stationary-phase resistance to ethanol.

Authors:  A Farewell; K Kvint; T Nyström
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Induction of petite yeast mutants by membrane-active agents.

Authors:  J Jiménez; E Longo; T Benítez
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  The isc gene cluster expression ethanol tolerance associated improves its ethanol production by organic acids flux redirection in the ethanologenic Escherichia coli KO11 strain.

Authors:  Lorena Martínez-Alcantar; Alma Laura Díaz-Pérez; Jesús Campos-García
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Colicin activity and abortive infection of T5 bacteriophage in Escherichia coli (ColIb).

Authors:  D H Duckworth; G B Dunn; T Pinkerton; K Rose; S K Walia
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Escherichia coli mar and acrAB mutants display no tolerance to simple alcohols.

Authors:  Jonas Ankarloo; Susanne Wikman; Ian A Nicholls
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Recovery of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from ethanol-induced growth inhibition.

Authors:  H M Walker-Caprioglio; R J Rodriguez; L W Parks
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  CesRK, a two-component signal transduction system in Listeria monocytogenes, responds to the presence of cell wall-acting antibiotics and affects beta-lactam resistance.

Authors:  Birgitte H Kallipolitis; Hanne Ingmer; Cormac G Gahan; Colin Hill; Lotte Søgaard-Andersen
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Ethanol-sensitive mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Aguilera; T Benítez
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Effects of ethanol on the Escherichia coli plasma membrane.

Authors:  K M Dombek; L O Ingram
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 3.490

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.