Literature DB >> 699548

Ultrasonography and CT scanning: a comparative study of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

M N Gomes, H G Hakkal, D Schellinger.   

Abstract

CT scanning has been successfully used in the evaluation of the abdominal aorta in over 70 patients. Half of this group, with abdominal aneurysms, was also studied by ultrasonography and the results compared. Both techniques proved equally reliable in the diagnosis of this entity. Closer correlation to the aneurysmal diameter measured at surgery was obtained by CT scanning; underestimation of size by ultrasonography was a frequent finding. Aortic lumen and intra-aneurysmal thrombus were also more clearly demonstrated by CT when contrast enhancement was added. Evaluation of aneurysmal length is done more effectively by ultrasonography although sagittal reconstruction by CT has been now attempted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 699548     DOI: 10.1016/0363-8235(78)90007-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8235


  6 in total

Review 1.  Periodic health examination, 1991 update: 5. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Limitations of computed tomography in leaking abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  R A Greatorex; A K Dixon; C D Flower; R W Pulvertaft
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-07-23

3.  Abdominal aortic diameter and vascular atherosclerosis: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  G A Laughlin; M A Allison; N E Jensky; V Aboyans; N D Wong; R Detrano; M H Criqui
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Computed tomography in aortobifemoral Y grafts.

Authors:  A Tuchmann; W Hruby
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Abdominal aortic aneurysm in high-risk patients. Outcome of selective management based on size and expansion rate.

Authors:  E F Bernstein; E L Chan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the abdominal aorta.

Authors:  I P Arlart; L Guhl; R R Edelman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.740

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.