Literature DB >> 6995374

Detection of visual defects using the contrast sensitivity function.

I Bodis-Wollner.   

Abstract

In this chapter the theoretical reasons were outlined and clinical data summarized as to why spatial contrast measurements can reveal visual losses that are not uncovered by testing visual acuity, no matter which optotype one uses or how carefully the measurement is made. Spatial contrast sensitivity measurements may disclose different types of contrast losses in patients with different lesions but with identical visual acuity. The relationship of different types of spatial contrast sensitivity losses (plotted as visuograms) to specific location or cause of lesions is not yet clear. Patients with glaucoma show losses that occur infrequently in other types of eye or visual pathway diseases, but the specificity of the typical contrast loss needs confirmation. The definite clinical value of contrast sensitivity measurements is that they can identify incipient abnormalities in the visual pathways that subserve foveal vision. In addition to this definite diagnostic application, using sinusoidal gratings as stimuli for both contrast sensitivity and for VEP measurements is useful in a research-oriented clinical testing facility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6995374     DOI: 10.1097/00004397-198002010-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin        ISSN: 0020-8167


  12 in total

1.  Visual function after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a prospective longitudinal evaluation.

Authors:  A Brahma; F Ennis; R Harper; A Ridgway; A Tullo
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The impact of penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus using the VF-14 questionnaire.

Authors:  N Ziakas; E Kanonidou; D Mikropoulos; N Georgiadis
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Spatio-temporal processing in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  M S Marx; J G May; J L Reed; H H Matteson; H J van Dyk; A Jayaraman
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-01-30       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Subretinal neovascularization in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.

Authors:  G Giuffrè; G Brancato
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Spatial contrast sensitivity in macular disorder.

Authors:  S Mitra
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-04-30       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Comparison of preoperative 10-Hz visual evoked potentials to contrast sensitivity and visual acuity after cataract extraction.

Authors:  S A Cavender; R R Hobson; G M Chao; G W Weinstein; J V Odom
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Impaired contrast sensitivity in diabetic patients with and without retinopathy: a new technique for rapid assessment.

Authors:  S Della Sala; G Bertoni; L Somazzi; F Stubbe; A J Wilkins
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Comparing Spatial Contrast Sensitivity Functions Measured With Digit and Grating Stimuli.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Menglu Shen; Xianghang He; Rong Cui; Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 9.  Validity of low-contrast letter acuity as a visual performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Laura J Balcer; Jenelle Raynowska; Rachel Nolan; Steven L Galetta; Raju Kapoor; Ralph Benedict; Glenn Phillips; Nicholas LaRocca; Lynn Hudson; Richard Rudick
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Contrast sensitivity and higher-order aberrations in Keratoconus subjects.

Authors:  Einat Shneor; David P Piñero; Ravid Doron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.