Literature DB >> 6993199

Human health hazards associated with chemical contamination of aquatic environment.

J F Stara, D Kello, P Durkin.   

Abstract

Given the finite supply of water available for human use, continued chemical contamination of the aquatic environment may pose a significant human health hazard. Consequently, an effort must be made to develop ambient water quality criteria to protect human health and preserve the integrity of the aquatic environment. In developing water quality criteria based on human health effects, information on sources of exposure, pharmacokinetics, and adverse effects must be carefully evaluated. Information on sources of exposure is needed to determine the contribution of exposure from water relative to all other sources. Pharmacokinetic data are used in inter- and intraspecies extrapolation and in characterizing the mode of toxic action. Information on toxic effects includes data on acute, subchronic, and chronic toxicity, mutagenicity, teratogenicity, and carcinogenicity. In analyzing such information, a distinction is made between threshold and nonthreshold effects. Currently, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity are considered to be nonthreshold effects. For carcinogens and mutagens, criteria are calculated by postulating an "acceptable" increased level of risk and using extrapolation models to estimate the dose which would result in this increased level of risk. For other chemicals, thresholds are assumed and criteria are calculated by deriving "acceptable daily intakes" for man which would presumably result in no observable adverse effects. Neither process is exact, and attempts must be made to improve and verify risk assessment methodologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6993199      PMCID: PMC1568534          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8034145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  31 in total

1.  Environmental factors in the origin of cancer and estimation of the possible hazard to man.

Authors:  H B Jones; A Grendon
Journal:  Food Cosmet Toxicol       Date:  1975-04

2.  Chemical carcinogens.

Authors:  M A Schneiderman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-02-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Skeletal deviations in rats: malformations or variations?

Authors:  C A Kimmel; J G Wilson
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1973-12

4.  Mortality study of workers in the manufacture of vinyl chloride and its polymers.

Authors:  I R Tabershaw; W R Gaffey
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1974-08

5.  Selection of the valid number of sampling units and a consideration of their combination in toxicological studies involving reproduction, teratogenesis or carcinogenesis.

Authors:  C S Weil
Journal:  Food Cosmet Toxicol       Date:  1970-04

6.  Symposium on the evaluation of the safety of food additives and chemical residues. II. The role of the laboratory animal study of intermediate duration for evaluation of safety.

Authors:  L Friedman
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Difficulties in extrapolating the results of toxicity studies in laboratory animals to man.

Authors:  D P Rall
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 6.498

8.  Mechanisms of carcinogenesis: dose response.

Authors:  P J Gehring; G E Blau
Journal:  J Environ Pathol Toxicol       Date:  1978 Sep-Oct

9.  Toxicological studies of certain alkylated benzenes and benzene; experiments on laboratory animals.

Authors:  M A WOLF; V K ROWE; D D MCCOLLISTER; R L HOLLINGSWORTH; F OYEN
Journal:  AMA Arch Ind Health       Date:  1956-10

10.  Characteristics of cases of angiosarcoma of the liver among vinyl chloride workers in the United States.

Authors:  C W Heath; H Falk; J L Creech
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1975-01-31       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Standards for chemical quality of drinking water: a critical assessment.

Authors:  R L Zielhuis
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  The nature and significance of public exposure to arsenic: a review of its relevance to South West England.

Authors:  P Mitchell; D Barre
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 3.  Using exposure bands for rapid decision making in the RISK21 tiered exposure assessment.

Authors:  M Dellarco; R Zaleski; B J Gaborek; H Qian; C A Bellin; P Egeghy; N Heard; O Jolliet; D R Lander; N Sunger; K S Stylianou; J Y Tanir
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  The current use of studies on promoters and cocarcinogens in quantitative risk assessment.

Authors:  J F Stara; D Mukerjee; R McGaughy; P Durkin; M L Dourson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.