Literature DB >> 6992913

Is a fat stitch necessary?

P J Milewski, H Thomson.   

Abstract

Two hundred and eight consecutive patients undergoing surgery were allocated randomly in a trial of the use of a plain catgut subcutaneous fat stitch, compared with no fat suture. There was no appreciable difference between the two trial groups in wound infection rate following either clean (4 out of 74 with and 1 out of 68 without a fat stitch) or contaminated operations (4 out of 27 with and 4 out of 41 without). Likewise, there were no differences in haematoma rates. There is therefore no appreciable benefit to be derived from the use of this stitch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6992913     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800670604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  4 in total

1.  To stitch or not to stitch the fat.

Authors:  W H Thomson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Review of general surgery 1980.

Authors:  H Ellis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Dermatologic Microsutures Using Human Hair: A Useful Technique in Cutaneous Stitching.

Authors:  Mohammed Al Azrak; Rei Ogawa
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2017-08-21

4.  Should we still stitch the subcutaneous fat layer? A clinical and ultrasound assessment in 50 hip operations.

Authors:  K Kong; N Jeyagopal; S J Davies
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.