Literature DB >> 6988748

Short- versus long-course prophylactic antibiotic treatment in Cesarean section patients.

L J D'Angelo, R J Sokol.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed to test the effectiveness of long and short courses of antibiotic prophylaxis in avoiding morbidity after cesarean section. Eighty internally monitored laboring patients who required cesarean section were randomly assigned to one of 3 treatment groups: 1) a control group (31 patients) of those receiving no prophylactic antibiotics, 2) a short-course group (24 patients) of those receiving 24 hours of cephalosporin prophylaxis, and 3) a long-course group (25 patients) of those receiving 5 days of cephalosporin prophylaxis. Evaluation of postpartum outcome was based on the development of endometritis and /or wound infection and on the fever index. Based on the findings of no significant differences between the 3 treatment groups for 11 potential risk factors for postpartum morbidity, randomization was judged to have been successful. A significant decrease in the rate of endometritis and/or wound infection was seen in both the short- and long-course prophylactic groups as compared to the control group (29%, 20%, and 65%, respectively). There were no significant differences in postpartum morbidity between the short- and long-course prophylactic groups. Based on fever index data and individual case evaluations, there was no evidence that antibiotic prophylaxis increased the chance of more severe infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6988748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  8 in total

1.  [Comparative efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis using cefoxitin in one or in three doses in cesarean section].

Authors:  A Masse; P Turgeon; N Gay; G Verschelden
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section.

Authors:  Gillian M I Gyte; Lixia Dou; Juan C Vazquez
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-11-17

3.  Cesarean section: a seven-year study.

Authors:  L R Weekes
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 4.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.

Authors:  Fiona M Smaill; Rosalie M Grivell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 5.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.

Authors:  Fiona M Smaill; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

6.  Comparison of moxalactam and cefazolin as prophylactic antibiotics during cesarean section.

Authors:  W Rayburn; M Varner; R Galask; C R Petzold; E Piehl
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  [Use of cephalosporins as antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section].

Authors:  P Fugère; P Turgeon; M Boucher; G Verschelden; M Lemay
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section.

Authors:  Myfanwy J Williams; Carolina Carvalho Ribeiro do Valle; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-03-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.