Literature DB >> 6987877

Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques.

M D Pus, D C Way.   

Abstract

An in vitro study using steel reference markers in the enamel of 100 premolars was carried out in order to determine the enamel loss resulting from each step in the placement and removal of bonded orthodontic attachments. Measurements were made by means of the optical system of a profile projector for orientation and positioning and a micrometer for quantification. Accuracy to within +/- 1 micron was achieved. The 10.7 micron of enamel lost during initial prophylaxis with bristle brush was greater than the 5.0 micron lost when a rubber cup was used, and the difference was statistically significant. A 90-second etch with phosphoric acid resulted in a mean loss of 6.9 micron, with no significant difference between liquid and gel forms. It was possible to clean up the unfilled resin with hand instruments only; this resulted in a mean enamel loss of 7.7 micron. Rotary instruments, however, were required for cleaning up filled resin. Within this group, more enamel was lost when the high-speed 7902 bur (19.2 micron) and green rubber wheel (18.4 micron) were used than when the low-speed 7111 bur (11.3 micron) was used. Total enamel loss ranged from 26.1 to 31.8 micron for unfilled resin and from 29.5 to 41.2 micron for filled resin, depending on the instrument used for prophylaxis and debonding. Twenty-seven of the teeth showed evidence of a perikymata-like structure after as much as 29 micron of enamel had been removed, questioning the reliability of anatomic landmarks as reference points in the study of enamel loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6987877     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(80)90082-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod        ISSN: 0002-9416


  22 in total

1.  [Elemental analytical and quantitative morphometric determination of the synthetic resin residues and enamel avulsion after the removal of metal brackets].

Authors:  T Ruppenthal; U Stratmann; H G Sergl; D Czech
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1992-04

2.  Roughness of enamel surfaces after different bonding and debonding procedures : An in vitro study.

Authors:  Lorenz M Brauchli; Eva-Maria Baumgartner; Judith Ball; Andrea Wichelhaus
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  Laser applications in orthodontics.

Authors:  Somayeh Heidari; Sepideh Torkan
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013

4.  [The bracket adhesion technic when using a shorter etching time. Clinical results].

Authors:  W Carstensen
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1988-04

5.  [Insertion of the Prophy-Jet instrument for enamel polishing after debonding].

Authors:  M Hannemann; P Diedrich
Journal:  Fortschr Kieferorthop       Date:  1986-08

6.  Influence of orthodontic adhesives and clean-up procedures on the stain susceptibility of enamel after debonding.

Authors:  Hyun-Jin Joo; Yong-Keun Lee; Dong-Yul Lee; Yae-Jin Kim; Yong-Kyu Lim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness after Various Finishing Techniques for Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets.

Authors:  Emire Aybüke Erdur; Mehmet Akın; Leyla Cime; Zehra İleri
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-03-01

8.  Impulse debracketing compared to conventional debonding.

Authors:  Michael Knösel; Simone Mattysek; Klaus Jung; Reza Sadat-Khonsari; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Oskar Bauss; Dirk Ziebolz
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Effects of different orthodontic adhesives and resin removal techniques on enamel color alteration.

Authors:  Yasemen Boncuk; Zafer C Cehreli; Ömür Polat-Özsoy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Evaluation of Enamel Roughness in Vitro After Orthodontic Bracket Debonding Using Different Methods of Residual Adhesive Removal.

Authors:  José Tarcísio Lima Ferreira; Maria Cristina Borsatto; Maria Conceição Pereira Saraiva; Mírian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto; Carolina Paes Torres; Fabio Lourenço Romano
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2020-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.