Literature DB >> 6987765

Pitfalls in randomized surgical trials.

W van der Linden.   

Abstract

Special problems may arise when the principles of the randomized trial are used to compare operative methods. In the trial design that is used at present, each surgeon performs the operatons to be compared in a random order. A prerequisite for a trial so designed to result in a fair comparison is that the participating surgeons are equally conversant with both techniques. If they are not, the design may imply systematic bias in favor of operations that are in wide use and bias in favor of technically simple procedures. An alternative to this design is given. Reports on trials should contain information about pretrial routine and level of training of participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6987765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  34 in total

Review 1.  Extent of resection as a prognostic variable in the treatment of gliomas.

Authors:  K R Hess
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Authors:  A Ros; L Gustafsson; H Krook; C E Nordgren; A Thorell; G Wallin; E Nilsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions.

Authors:  Peter McCulloch; Irving Taylor; Mitsuru Sasako; Bryony Lovett; Damian Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-15

4.  Users' guide to the surgical literature. How to assess a randomized controlled trial in surgery.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Forough Farrokhyar; Mohit Bhandari; Ved Tandan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  More or LESS.

Authors:  R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Plea of the defence-critical comments on the interpretation of EVA3S, SPACE and ICSS.

Authors:  Jens Fiehler; Søren Jacob Bakke; Andrew Clifton; Emmanuel Houdart; Olav Jansen; Daniel Rüfenacht; Michael Söderman; Christophe Cognard
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  Need for expertise based randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Mohit Bhandari; Mike Clarke; Victor M Montori; Deborah J Cook; Salim Yusuf; David L Sackett; Claudio S Cinà; S D Walter; Brian Haynes; Holger J Schünemann; Geoffrey R Norman; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-08

8.  The Study Centre of the German Surgical Society--rationale and current status.

Authors:  Hanns-Peter Knaebel; Markus K Diener; Moritz N Wente; Hartwig Bauer; Markus W Büchler; Matthias Rothmund; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Developing appropriate methodology for the study of surgical techniques.

Authors:  Peter McCulloch
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Orthopaedic surgeons prefer to participate in expertise-based randomized trials.

Authors:  Elzbieta Bednarska; Dianne Bryant; P J Devereaux
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.